We still have Matt Oakley. Who legs have also gone
Really..? Matty's only [bloody hell, I just looked it up] 34. In any case, at his age he should still be able to play for 90 minutes. This isn't the 1960's, where at 30+ you were washed up.
We still have Matt Oakley. Who legs have also gone
Neil Danns- does **** all
What's happened to Danns then? I work near Selhurst Park and got to see quite a few Palace games in the past and he always impressed me.
He looks out of his depth to be honest
I think Sven got him back accident, i think he was meant to sign Sean Scannell but they looked the same and he got the wrong one
That does surprise me but so does everything else at Leicester City seeing as I had them as one of the favourites to go up this year.
I reckon we'll win 1-0.
The only worry you should have is finding a way past Kasper Schmeichel, the rest should be pretty straight forward

What's happened to Danns then? I work near Selhurst Park and got to see quite a few Palace games in the past and he always impressed me.
Surely your not saying you will park the bus.........That would be disappointing. You have the players why not have a go...you did when we came to you!
We wont park the bus, we will probaly try and fail to attack you
What formation do you typically play? What is the energy in your midfield like? We have struggled most when teams have loaded the midfield, and close our players down quickly giving them no time on the ball (particularly in midfield). This is how Bristol City beat us home and away, and other teams that have been effective against us have played in a similar way. Not that we tend to play the long ball that much, but without Lambert, we won't be able to take that option should you close us down and prevent us playing our passing football.