You think that is justified as a means to an end? I don't. I think it is unsporting to coin a phrase.Sporting sanctions are sporting sanctions, it's pretty obvious. Any sporting sanction will impact thousands of fans who had no responsibility.
You think that is justified as a means to an end? I don't. I think it is unsporting to coin a phrase.Sporting sanctions are sporting sanctions, it's pretty obvious. Any sporting sanction will impact thousands of fans who had no responsibility.
The original Rule 127
127.1 Without prejudice to the requirements of Regulation 3.4 (that each Club shall behave towards each
other Club with the utmost good faith), no Club shall directly or indirectly observe (or attempt to
observe) another Club’s training session in the period of 72 hours prior to any match scheduled to be
played between those respective Clubs
The -3 Point has been added in our case Using Rule 3.4 as a trigger.
Not what I meant, just that the Rule 3.4 is used as an extension to decide the punishment as 127 has no proscribed sentence to use.You said the point deduction wasn't given for breach of 127 but the judgement literally states that the logic for deciding the 3 point is that it makes breaching 127 not worthwhile - you'll lose the same as what you can gain.
You think that is justified as a means to an end? I don't. I think it is unsporting to coin a phrase.
It's good that we can debate the rights and wrongs, but isn't making me feel better about it, it feels wrong and its futile to protest.
You are putting words in to my mouth, that I haven't said. I repeat, the punishment must fit the crime and must punish the guilty, not harming people who haven't been responsible, guilty by association isn't the way to go. Are you saying fines don't do that?So we're back to my previous question, you don't think sporting sanctions are ever justified because it impacts the fans?
I'm saying it's the reality of the situation. I do think sporting sanctions are a more effective deterrent than financial ones, whether I agree with this particular case or not.
I said that any sporting sanction impacts the fans who weren't responsible and you said you didn't feel that was justified? Seemed pretty clear to me.You are putting words in to my mouth, that I haven't said. I repeat, the punishment must fit the crime and must punish the guilty, not harming people who haven't been responsible, guilty by association isn't the way to go. Are you saying fines don't do that?
They will find plenty of other ways to get around the current Rules and I bet no one bats an eyelid, it will be cheating, but not as we know it.I said that any sporting sanction impacts the fans who weren't responsible and you said you didn't feel that was justified? Seemed pretty clear to me.
I'm saying fines don't act as an effective deterrent if the football club can easily afford it, so in that sense sporting sanctions act as a better one, whether I agree with this particular case or not.
For example you can be pretty certain that nobody will risk breaching this rule in the play offs next season!
Ironically, I haven't yet!Got my refund
Season ticket info please.
It won't happen the same next time. A team will have different aspects to their case, alongside having a more influential owner, and the court of public opinion will have reflected over time on this being way too harsh, and the EFL will be more forgiving. The ruling will continue to be undefined, allowing the EFL to use whatever measures it wants to, on a case by case basis.Well the deterrent exists now. Going forward EFL clubs will know the punishment is 3 point deduction for a league game or expulsion for a knockout one.
Agree about punishment not being defined beforehand though which is a big part of why this has been such a mess. Sadly that seems quite common with football rules though.
Ironically, I haven't yet!
Do we have to request a refund?!!Ooh - what do I win?
Yeah it was just saying that the refund request from SFC was successful and it would land in about 4-5 days. It was worded as if I had applied for a refund which of course I hadn't. I'll let you know what happens.
No the club are issuing them automatically. The wording from my bank read that way though.Do we have to request a refund?!!
Is this a ploy by Arsenal to get PSG chucked out?Tonda just got excited
Parsons apparently on leave this week.
Call me a **** but that should have been cancelled.