Sanity re-established. If we are ever in for two players with the same forename simultaneously we might have to think about changing the rules, but for now...
Sanity re-established. If we are ever in for two players with the same forename simultaneously we might have to think about changing the rules, but for now...
Sanity re-established. If we are ever in for two players with the same forename simultaneously we might have to think about changing the rules, but for now...
Looks like this may still happen.
Looks like this may still happen.
Better than Yoshida.
That's not really saying much.
If we're sitting here at the end of the transfer window with Vlaar as a replacement for Lovren, I will be very disappointed. If however we're sitting here with Vlaar as a replacement for Yoshida, then I will be very happy.
And that wont necessarily mean Vlaar accepting a place on the bench each week. Firstly, every squad utilises more than two CBs. Secondly, a lot of talk is going around about us playing 5-3-2/3-4-3/3-4-1-2 etc at times any way.
So you're happy with us spending £10m on a goalkeeper (a position where we already have enough Premier League quality starters) but not happy if we buy Vlaar at centre back (a position where we don't have enough Premier League quality starters)?
So you're happy with us spending £10m on a goalkeeper (a position where we already have enough Premier League quality starters) but not happy if we buy Vlaar at centre back (a position where we don't have enough Premier League quality starters)?