With a year left on his contract and with a team on the slide - hopefully we are getting him as a cover for a reasonable price - I am assuming (hoping) we are after a a quality replacement for Lovren...
I think Ron Vlaar would be a very good signing., Would offer a lot of experience, tactical nous., Stability to the squad. He was v. good for Villa, But he had youngsters around him all the time.. a defense always changing... Hard to get a real grip of defence.
Caulker or Vlaar?
I don't think that's the choice being made here.
I know it's not, but as fairly underwhelming signings go, which would you rather?
I don't see a young, yet experienced CB with England potential to be underwhelming.
Nor do I see a player who starred against some of the best players in the world on the way to a 3rd place finish at the World Cup underwhelming.
I wasn't expecting Pique here. They would both be suitable together, or one of them plus one of the other CBs who have been linked.
If we ended up replacing Lovren with Vlaar, I would be very disappointed.
There's no doubting that Vlaar had a good World Cup. But I'd rather we didn't base our transfer decisions of what a player does for their country in the biggest competition in the world, which they only have the privilege to play in once every four years.
He has rarely impressed me at Villa, and more often than not I find myself watching him play for them and wondering how on earth he can be first choice for a country like Holland.
Now if it were Vlaar for Fonte - or even better, Vlaar for Yoshida/Jos - then fine, I'd have no issue with that. But Vlaar for Lovren? I'd want to vomit.
The title of this thread is really frustrating me.
Mods please change to keep Dan and joe sane,
lamballana:6782359 said:Mods please change to attempt to make Dan and Joe sane.