He's really not that old for a goalkeeper. I just think we need other players more. When Koeman came in our first choice striker was Sam Gallagher for goodness sake. And who are our first choice (fit) wingers? Tadic and... Isgrove?
Seriously, do you people actually watch Saints? Have you seen our backup keepers? One is as old as the hills, and the other one can't catch.
It shouldn't be too much of a chunk, we've got loads of money.I'm with you there. 10M is a high fee for a goalkeeper (Arsenal signed Ospinna, Columbian international keeper, for 3M) and while I don't mind signing Forster, it would madden me if a large chunk of our transfer budget went on signing a new keeper when there are other pressing needs to solve.
But if we strengthen in other areas as well, then it's ok.

Just because we buy a gk doesn't mean we won't get another foward or winger. It's not like we can only deal with buying one player at a time.
no beefy, you don't understand, we haven't signed a cb or a winger yet, this clearly means that we're not going to!
We're paying a lot of money for a keeper while our 1st choice is more than adequate. Would be better spent on a CB and another forward where we are seriously lacking quality and numbers.
Once again - do people really think because we've spent £10m on Forster we won't pay sizeable fees for other players?
I dont understand where people are getting that from. Tadić for £11m, Pellè for £8m, Forster for £10m. There are more like this to come.
Just because we buy a gk doesn't mean we won't get another foward or winger. It's not like we can only deal with buying one player at a time.
It shouldn't be too much of a chunk, we've got loads of money.
I reckon we could sign Lionel Messi and some fans wouldn't be happy: "we wasted our whole budget on one player".![]()

We're paying a lot of money for a keeper while our 1st choice is more than adequate. Would be better spent on a CB and another forward where we are seriously lacking quality and numbers.