S.A.F.C. - the future

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Southern Adam said:
I’ve asked James Hunter for clarity on whether he’s actually heard Jim Rodwell is choosing the manager or whether it’s educated guesswork based on current framework.

It’s an important distinction when you have people trying to pour over every rumour and believing what they want to believe and not what they don’t.
Click to expand...

What he's too silly to realise is that the club HAVE to give the impression the sacking of Parkinson was their decision and not of the incoming owners, whether that be true or not. If it's found to be an instruction from the incoming owners, Parkinson can sue the club for a significant fee - see the Colemon lawsuit for example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Robertson, Bank of England 2, Mackem49000 and 2 others
SAFC-D22 said:
What he's too silly to realise is that the club HAVE to give the impression the sacking of Parkinson was there decision and not of the incoming owners, whether that be true or not. If it's found to be an instruction from the incoming owners, Parkinson can sue the club for a significant fee - see the Colemon lawsuit for example.
Click to expand...

Honestly, I am amazed at the depths some are willing to go to continue the negativity mate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dorset, Guy Incognito, Notaskyboy and 5 others
Prehab26 said:
Honestly, I am amazed at the depths some are willing to go to continue the negativity mate.
Click to expand...
If they see something that fits their narrative, they'll repost it online to gain some sort of notoriety, despite not knowing it true or not. But if there's something that debunks whatever they say, it's automatically wrong. There wasn't even a takeover according to the same people a week or so ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guy Incognito, Lewberry Pie, sad-eyed prophet and 3 others
Julio said:
Massive shock to see that Chris Weatherspoon on twitter being as negative as its possible to be about all this

He just needs to **** SD and get it out of his system like
Click to expand...

I've said before, he's got an agenda against the owners, previous, current and now future ones. Just because he was right about Donald doesn't mean he hasn't got an agenda to push and it looks like he's going to carry it on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Left For Dead, sad-eyed prophet, janey and 1 other person
Southern Adam said:
You must log in or register to see media

As expected - James Hunter just going off the statement. Wise Men Say have reacted as if it’s therefore news and proof that this is a all a sham.

hopefully this clears it up.
Click to expand...
Wise Men Say really need to reign themselves in. It only took one minute to deduce that Hunter had no evidence for his claim and was basing it on the statement from SAFC which never indicated Rodwell’s direct involvement.

WMS seem very desperate to spread the negativity.

Also, this may seem a bit conspiratorial but I noticed a little bit of bitterness between some Roker Report lads and WMS lads on twitter the last couple of days. Ever since RR’s exclusive on the takeover I get the feeling they may have rekindled their connection with the club in some way. Now WMS seem a bit more peeved off. There’s been a couple of smarmy tweets. Just guessing here though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guy Incognito, Mick Sterbs, Left For Dead and 3 others
Wardley Makem said:
Cup Final was boring as owt. As was the relegation escape.
Click to expand...
Okay you've persuaded me. He escaped relegation. Although, maybe we should go for Martin O'Neil, instead. He done that, too.

Hopefully he brings the Real Madrid maestro back with him, if he does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gillmackem
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back