Rwanda

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
<doh>I’m still waiting your definition, you keep giving wisecrack answers, but avoid the question

Nothing wisecrack about it. you have had the definition. adult human female that is it. you have had that answer from three posters. do you think an adult female human is a woman?? very simple question there.
 
Last edited:
<laugh><laugh>Where Is Jiffie ?, is he ok, haven’t seen him for a while
Jiffie has not been about since the end of April, he is a valued member and well missed, he is a very intelligent guy with strong opinions and a combatative nature, maybe he is having a break until the new season starts, I hope he is well and our forum would welcome him back in the future or at a time to suit him.
 
what the hell has it got to do with the EU. One of the very few benefits of leaving the EU was that they couldn't interfere in our policitcs and policies anymore?
I replied without really having digested the comments in the media .. which basically stated letters and thwarted at last minute by judgement from european source..
All has been since explained a different entity to EU RIGHTS .... STARTED UP ABOUT 50 60 years ago.
 
Correct Wiz
We signed up to the ECHR 7 years before the Treaty Of Rome and well before we joined the single European Market which came later again.

There is no link between the EU and the ECHR, but we need to get our signature off it (ECHR) asap and stop this charade of being told who we can and can't deport by judges in Strasbourg. Ridiculous situation.

Funny how this ECHR is not stopping the boats from leaving France. Surely that is far more dangerous to the rmigrants than going to Rwanda? Everyone has always known that the UK is the favoured destination as they get everything they want handed to them here, and the refusal to go to Rwanda proves this. If it really were that they feared for their lives in their own country, then anywhere would be better. It's all BS
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redprintt
Here you go.


You must log in or register to see images
We can all look up the dictionary literal definition, that wasn’t really my point. You are obviously avoiding providing your opinion, or maybe you don’t have one, other than the literal one.
 
Funny how this ECHR is not stopping the boats from leaving France. Surely that is far more dangerous to the rmigrants than going to Rwanda? Everyone has always known that the UK is the favoured destination as they get everything they want handed to them here, and the refusal to go to Rwanda proves this. If it really were that they feared for their lives in their own country, then anywhere would be better. It's all BS
I’m sure they would if France were arranging the boats, they don’t have jurisdiction over illegal trafficking <laugh><laugh>
 
We can all look up the dictionary literal definition, that wasn’t really my point. You are obviously avoiding providing your opinion, or maybe you don’t have one, other than the literal one.

To me this is the definition, a female, by birth has those characteristics; whereas, a woman, who may or may have not been born that way does not. It's crystal clear to me, not sure why everyone is getting confused? In the modern world a female and a woman are not necessarily the same.
 
what the hell has it got to do with the EU. One of the very few benefits of leaving the EU was that they couldn't interfere in our policitcs and policies anymore?
The EU is nothing to do with the European Commission on Human Rights (ECHR)

It's a separate council body that we signed up to around 70 years ago, and which we may need to exit from to deport not only these illegals who have no right to be here, but also convicted murderers, rapists and drug dealers that we also haven't easily been able to deport due to more lawyers getting injunctions to halt British law/judicial system, or we have to find an alternative method for bypassing it so that they can't do so in future and we really can make decisions that cannot be challenged.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red Robin
To me this is the definition, a female, by birth has those characteristics; whereas, a woman, who may or may have not been born that way does not. It's crystal clear to me, not sure why everyone is getting confused? In the modern world a female and a woman are not necessarily the same.
Now I understand your point. Thank you, can’t say I’ve thought of it like that before, food for thought.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Supcon72