Just a quick question, if you’ve not watched them for months, how can you know they’re a disgrace? , surely to make a judgment you need to watch them.The same BBC who have told parents of toddlers on their own Website to be aware of their White Privilege if their kids don't mix with kids of colour, but of course that only applies one way.
Never mind the areas of the country like East London, and Leicester etc where kids of colour don't or can't easily mix with white children !
The BBC are now a national disgrace and I haven't watched anything they provide in terms of TV for months, and nor will I going forward.
The sooner they are shut down or reformed the better. Apart from the fact that my Missus will be out of work as she works with them on behalf of a 3rd party !
Because the latest woke BS was reported on both Sky News and GB NewsJust a quick question, if you’ve not watched them for months, how can you know they’re a disgrace? , surely to make a judgment you need to watch them.
Should this policy ever happen it will be interesting how many of the single male 20/30year old migrants decide to cross the channel.
itv report showed the hostel 50 rooms = 100 residents [ for approx 3weeks ] they then should be well on way to being processed and leave that place with options? so sayThis will cover how many refugees a year?
Does the cost base analysis stack up?
Rwanda will receive £120m a year.
This will cover how many refugees a year?
Does the cost base analysis stack up?
The £120m is not the total, it’s just a sweetener, it’ll cost much more than that.Rwanda will receive £120m a year.
This will cover how many refugees a year?
Does the cost base analysis stack up?
I don’t think it’ll happen, it’ll be found to be illegalAccording to Home Office figures it costs over £4million a day to 'house' refugees.
The Rwanda policy seems a good deal and stacks up.
And let's see how many 20/30 year single male migrants take the Rwanda option.
unfortunately what is illegal is the immigrants! This new action can be put into law and then it is guarded.I don’t think it’ll happen, it’ll be found to be illegal
Even the government expect a legal challenge, immigration isn’t illegal , just the method, the difficulty the Ukrainians have found trying to come into the country just highlight’s how slow and ponderous our system is. If we had a more efficient system that allowed genuine refugees in I’d have sympathy for this approach, as it is we don’t, that is a fact, therefore I don’t approve of this approach as many that are genuine will be caught in it. That is just plain wrong.unfortunately what is illegal is the immigrants! This new action can be put into law and then it is guarded.
Dont think the 97% is correct more than is published get removed and at least +2% of either not caught or caught and await decision abscond
sort of correct a bit of a hypocrity [ not you !] An individual making a effort to "migrate" into a country without following procedure is doing so illegally!immigration isn’t illegal , just the method,
I really don’t believe most brits are as mean minded as you appear to be.Get em gone they are here for one thing free homes-free money-free food at the cost to us taxpayers.
This government needs to sort it with law and order and it will romp in next time.