why read it then son? just stick to your knee jerk hysteria about your owners,that makes more sense..
The reason you'll get banned is because you're misrepresenting people's views in order to stir it up. Using the same description of a person as the person uses to describe themselves is not insulting. At no point have I said we should hound the owners out. If you'd read my posts like I told you to you'd have seen that I've been saying I'm waiting to see what has actually happened before taking sides. You'd also have noticed that I'm telling you to pack in being a WUM, whilst defending Proud's posting on here, so you can forget about trying to claim it's a case of not liking an ousider posting on it.
Definitely the Allam's. And Fallen, stop irritating people, we don't ban people for having an opinion, but we do for getting on everyone else's nerves.
I for one would like to thank the Leicester poster for defending OUR owners and for taking the abuse thrown at him for doing so. If the Allam's had not come to our rescue where would we be now? They have gone on record in an interview stating that there was money available in January for a push to get to the promised land and all it entails monetary wise, why lay themselves open to all sorts of accusations and lie about it? They would have surely been better off with us in the premiership, they are astute businessmen after all unlike most of us keyboard warriors/manager/owners who know nothing as fact. I have been as guilty as voicing my opinions on here at times, this is what this forum is about surely? ,so why is it when someone comes from another board and does it he is villified for standing up for OUR OWNERS, some of you need to bang your heads against the wall. Adam Pearson is well known for being cautious with money as that is what he excels at and Barms may also have fallen into this trap with spending in January, only time will tell on this one I am afraid,at the time I seem to remember that Sharp's agent was trying to get him here, can the fact that Adam and Nick went against the owners wishes be the cause of all this business this week? I fully expect certain members/tools on here to be having a go at me for my views but remember I HAVE THE RIGHT TO EXPRESS THEM FREELY AS YOU DO. Where's me coat
The facts are all on this board for anyone who wants to know. The people who choose to ignore them are the ones defending the Allams. The majority of us who know which posters to trust realise that the owners have made an almighty ****up.
Are you trying to say that I am not capable of reading the facts and having the capacity to make my own decisions on the matter? None of us know what is really going on at the club but a few follow what is said on here like sheep and woe betide anyone who comes on with a different view. I for one have a mind of my own and have been using it very well for the last 60 years, I did not get where I am ( albeit not where the Allam's are ) by listening to gossip on football boards. If the owners say there was money available who are we to disbelieve them, oh wait you have put millions into the club and are a joint owner, therefore know what is going on NOT. I will wait and see what transpiers over the next few days before shooting my mouth off on here about knowing what is going on or isn't as the case may be. The owners may have ****d up as has been said but their 51 million gift/loan/tax dodge or whatever gives them the right to I would have though. Shall I get my coat now?
Like I said I will make up my own mind when all the facts are presented by the people that matter. Until that time as I do not have 51 million to fund buying the club and prove things one way or another I will make up my own mind instead of being a follower of what others have heard.
^^^^Agreed. There are alot of ways to look at this, and it's totally different to getting inside information about potential signings. You can claim all you want to follow the people who know instead of gossip, but at the end of the day your relying on sources that are word of mouth and therefore may not be impartial. You assume the internal source has been impartial in passing the information and then the poster being impartial on posting the information. Its been quite clear that when the information has been posted its been posted in an impartial manner with the posters clearly positioning negatively towards the owners. Therefore making your opinion an opinion of an opinion and NOT fact.
Some of the comments that have been made in the last 2 days beggar belief and some of them from trusted sources ( which BTW can be found on this thread ) are definately slanted against the Allam's. I have a good friend who works at the club and he/she says don't believe all you read on the boards as some of them are just on a power trip. I am the first to admit that certain users on here are quick with their ( facts ), they speak to the same people that I do obviously. At the end of the day all these facts are just hearsay and speculation until they become the final deal.The only exception to this rule is if it comes from the club itself, therefore follow/believe who/what you like if it makes you feel part of the gang and in the know, as it is a free country after all BUT do not come on here and tell me what is what unless you are either the Allam's/Pearson/Barmby.Thank You Civility costs nothing you see
Both. Plus the players did not actually like Nigel Pearson and his Sgt major approach. Bully boy attitudes. I dont see them leaving Hull for Lesta, but wont rule out other clubs maybe.
Interesting thoughts Robo. But one question ? If the Allams wanted Sharp but AP/NB did not, then why did the Allams not sign off on Robert Snodgrass from TWS who was cheaper than Sharp and also a better player i would suggest ?
