You must log in or register to see images
That's a dive Mr Fox!
I've seen the full program... he makes one hell of a mess of the cockerel that was hiding beneath the snow ... feathers everywhere ...
You must log in or register to see images
That's a dive Mr Fox!
You should read my post on the last page. I talked about the Gareth Bale syndrome. Because he dived a few times and won free kicks, Refs identified him as a diver and after that, even if he was fouled it was given as a dive. I'm admitting that Bale dived a few times and got a bad name for himself. Just as Vardy has now. Not blinkered at all.

I've seen the full program... he makes one hell of a mess of the cockerel that was hiding beneath the snow ... feathers everywhere ...![]()
I agree with the booking and red card. As for the description off the referee, generally in the match, for and against both side, Vardy pretty much summed him up so no extended ban!Dear John,
Welcome to the Spurs Board.
Thanks for admitting it was a dive. You may not be alone but amongst your moderators, you represent a minority of one. There are plenty of people on here who will call out our players for diving when it occurs (whether punished in the game or not). Your Moderators appear to have confused a fairy story (where people get what they want to come true because that is what they want) and life where bad things happen and punishment is meted out to those who cheat and abuse others when they are caught.
Can you advise whether you agree :
that having dived it was a booking?
that he deserved to be sent off given that he had already been booked and those are the laws of the game?
he deserves to be banned for more than one game for calling the referee a "fooking coont"?
he deserves more than two games if he also referred to the referee cheating?
If you agree with these, please can you let your Moderators and the England Football Manager know. It maybe worthwhile getting them to admit the truth on other misguided beliefs that despite being nonsense are held by some in that:
Elvis is dead;
The moon landings were real; and
Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone
Thanks Jon.
In my opinion, a number of Spurs fans are being very blinkered and the indignation shown is personal due to it being Vardy and Leicester rather than being against diving in general. If Kane did the same in the next game for example, I expect you'd all be jumping to his defence and be in an uproar if he was sent off as the general train of thought seems to be that everything should go in Spurs favour. I doubt many of you would come on and say as I have with Vardy, that it was a dive
I agree with the booking and red card. As for the description off the referee, generally in the match, for and against both side, Vardy pretty much summed him up so no extended ban!
In all seriousness, the ref had a shocker and Vardy's reaction was heat of the moment. By the letter of the law, he probably would get an extra game ban. In order to not hand the title to Spurs and keep it interesting, and also to go into the Euros with strikers in form, I'd say the red card and game ban is punishment enough in the circumstances. Maybe that is more hope talking
So, dive or not? Don't let the fox thing confuse you.


I'm starting to wonder if Roy's making it worse for Vardy? Do the panel go in hard to prove that Roy didn't influence them?
Let the best team win and all behave like gentlemen.


Where does he try to con the referee?
He gives he has been fouled. As you obviously would in that situation. But when you look at it you can clearly see that Vardy runs into ogbonna rather than vise versa.
No penalty, no dive.
So you think that he initiates contact in order to fool the ref into giving a penalty?... as I've said all along - Vardy could feel the tug/arm on his shoulder - he knows he's quicker - he also knows that there is the potential for a penalty - he deliberately steps across Ogbona (nothing to stop him doing that) looking for the leg entanglement ... not a dive because he knows with legs entangled they are both going over ... but does gild the liliy with exaggerated leg movements - which I believe costs him ultimately ... no penalty for sure because Ogbona leg entanglement is not intentional / foul play on his part ... but I also don't think it is a booking for Vardy, because the contact, however it happens, means that at the pace he is travelling he will be going over ... Winston Reid's was more of a 'dive' - arms outstretched - flings himself forward
... that is my opinion in full ... I accept that I might be in the minority on this board ... with only my good mate Spurlock in full support![]()
... as I've said all along - Vardy could feel the tug/arm on his shoulder - he knows he's quicker - he also knows that there is the potential for a penalty - he deliberately steps across Ogbona (nothing to stop him doing that) looking for the leg entanglement ... not a dive because he knows with legs entangled they are both going over ... but does gild the liliy with exaggerated leg movements - which I believe costs him ultimately ... no penalty for sure because Ogbona leg entanglement is not intentional / foul play on his part ... but I also don't think it is a booking for Vardy, because the contact, however it happens, means that at the pace he is travelling he will be going over ... Winston Reid's was more of a 'dive' - arms outstretched - flings himself forward
... that is my opinion in full ... I accept that I might be in the minority on this board ... with only my good mate Spurlock in full support![]()
So you think that he initiates contact in order to fool the ref into giving a penalty?
That's unsportsmanlike behaviour then, wouldn't you say? What's the punishment for that, again?
You're saying that he initiates contact to make the ref believe that he's been fouled, which he hasn't.... I think he initiates contact to get a penalty not to fool the ref ... initiating contact is not a crime ... many players wil nudge the ball past an onrushing keeper knowing the likelihood is that they will get clattered ... but will get a penalty ... not so different if you have the ball in your possession which Vardy did ...
You're saying that he initiates contact to make the ref believe that he's been fouled, which he hasn't.
How is that not trying to fool the ref?
He knowingly moves his legs/ body into the direction of Ogbonna's run to give off the impression Ogbonna has gone into him with a poorly timed tackle, Vardy rolls over and then waves his arm up crying to the ref as if he should be getting a penalty.
Cheating, booking.
He's not trying to get in front of his man and draw a foul, though... in this instance I don't believe he was fouled ... hence not a penalty ... but if you are quick enough to step across a pursuing player (which he is - and you are entitled to do if you are quicker) there is every possibility that the oposing player will not be able to stop his momentum and will end up fouling you ... the intent is not to fool the ref ,,, the intent is to draw a penalty from being fouled ....
In my view, he never got anywhere near far enough in front of the defender to justify trying to cross in front of him. He initiated the contact by moving into the defender and then blatantly dived. Simulation - yellow card.
I suppose all the years of getting nowhere has created fantasies among Leicester supporters. Perfectly understandable but a little sad..
