I must admit that I really bought into the Leicester story. Yes it is certainly refreshing to have a non-Sky favoured team in the top 4, don't get me wrong about that. Also everything looks fine when you see them on MOTD because they certainly have enough highlights for most matches (not necessarily Wednesday's!) However when you have to watch a whole match you do see a distinct lack of ambition other than to rely on the other team doing the work and effectively stealing the match. That isn't always going to work, regardless of how much people like to draw conclusions from one season of success (at least I really hope it doesn't always work!)
They certainly have a few good players, again looking good on MOTD, but until you see them over a whole match you don't see what else they get up to. I really don't think a great player can be a cheat as well (though I seem to be in a minority there). Yet they don't get any criticism from pundits - it's almost like it's taken the pundits a year to realise that Leicester are quite good, and now they've adjusted their position they aren't prepared to look at any depth about how Leicester are achieving these results. Perhaps it's fear of not wanting to be the first to burst the bubble, just as any criticism from a Spurs supporter is probably seen as sour grapes, but it's not. It's not like Leicester could guarantee that we wouldn't score our good chances and they would.
On Wednesday they had two shots on target, yet I didn't hear any commentators suggest that they didn't deserve to win. They get so much praise for counter attack, but the team doing the attacking get any credit. So how boring would the league be if everyone went only to counter attack! Perhaps it will be telling to see how they do against Villa this weekend who aren't going to pin them back with 60% of the possession - if Villa do get over half possession that will be very sad! In some ways I think Villa have as much chance of beating them as we did.