It was mutual. They sacked him and he got sacked.Just in case there's somebody out there who thinks it was a mutual decision...
You must log in or register to see media
It was mutual. They sacked him and he got sacked.Just in case there's somebody out there who thinks it was a mutual decision...
You must log in or register to see media
It was mutual.
They sacked him, and he gladly took the pauoff.
. After the PL and refs defended the decision, saying it was right by the letter of the law, they've now done a u-turn and accepted another rule change midway through the campaign.You must log in or register to see media
. After the PL and refs defended the decision, saying it was right by the letter of the law, they've now done a u-turn and accepted another rule change midway through the campaign.
The guidance just confuses the issue further. The Laws have got progressively more stupid over the last few seasons. There are now many examples of ambiguities and ludicrous wording. They need a full review.You must log in or register to see media
. After the PL and refs defended the decision, saying it was right by the letter of the law, they've now done a u-turn and accepted another rule change midway through the campaign.
*Pretends to be shocked*
Whatever turd decided that the initial rule was fine should be sacked.
should be shot
and have his bank balance investigated
That also works.should be shot
and have his bank balance investigated
It's a cylindrical pipe that the mafia used to beat pedantic smartarses withWhat's a pauoff![]()

West Ham currently in 4th.
Come on Woy, FFS sort it. We can’t have that bunch in a CL spot.
West Ham are above us.
West fecking Ham.
