Rival watch

It was mutual. They sacked him and he got sacked.

 

< fixed > < FACT >

 

What's a pauoff

 

. After the PL and refs defended the decision, saying it was right by the letter of the law, they've now done a u-turn and accepted another rule change midway through the campaign.

 

*Pretends to be shocked*

Whatever turd decided that the initial rule was fine should be sacked.

 

The guidance just confuses the issue further. The Laws have got progressively more stupid over the last few seasons. There are now many examples of ambiguities and ludicrous wording. They need a full review.

 

should be shot

and have his bank balance investigated

 

That also works.

 

1. interesting order of action

2. ^ his bank balance ^ the blank brown envelopes in his bin

 

According to Dale Johnson of ESPN on Twatter, FIFA and UEFA used this clip as an example of offside 4 years ago:

Son's offside, the defender plays the ball deliberately and is in control and he's challenged very quickly.
That's absolutely fine and exactly how this has been reffed. The Rodri one is the outlier here.

 

It's a cylindrical pipe that the mafia used to beat pedantic smartarses with

 

West Ham currently in 4th.

Come on Woy, FFS sort it. We can’t have that bunch in a CL spot.

 

Want them to finish in a UEFA "conference" league slot,
so they can be reunited with their old mates ...

 

spam top 4

please log in to view this image

 

West Ham are above us.

West fecking Ham.

 

Goons are only 3 points behind us

 

Were we offline?

 

Yep!