Referee 2 - Newcastle 1- there has to be an investigation surely?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
We got a bit of shocker yesterday. It happens and its down to the assessor to mark the officials down. That is the system and it is one I think is a good one. It usually results in them being demoted.

Of course if he is not marked down then that system has failed on this occasion. A blind man can see he has had an absolute mare. I don't he's a particularly bad ref and although I was livid yesterday, in the cold light of day we've just got a raw deal and should get on with it. **** happens. Undoubtedly costly for us though as we'd likely have went on to win.

The tackle was a shocker. For none of the three to call it for what it was is quite unbelievable. The lad in question will hopefully get one in the future.

The hand ball was a joke but was a melee so I can understand it. But then they did miss that the ball should never have up there also as it was a corner from Cisse's shot.

Also in the same passage of play as the Haidara tackle, did the player not deliberately stop the ball going down the line with his hand? Is that not a yellow?

On the last point, I think that was viewed by the ref as him sportingly putting the ball out of play to allow treatment for our player, as otherwise it is a clear yellow
 
how's it going Hot Pockets...
You must log in or register to see images
..This is the image that I have when I think of you, only with its head stuck up its own arse..

[video=youtube;JcNhDstL4-k]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcNhDstL4-k[/video]
 
On the last point, I think that was viewed by the ref as him sportingly putting the ball out of play to allow treatment for our player, as otherwise it is a clear yellow

Really? I saw as him blatantly stopping the ball going down the line. Didn't appear too concerned with Haidara, none of them did.
 
I'm both a senile old fool and a dribbling old bastard so please don't tar us all with the same brush, how the dozy old twat( I'm one of those as well) can defend that is beyond all reasoning.

I was working yesterday so didn't see the match or even the highlights, however I've just seen the tackle on You Tube....f*ck me that's as bad as I've seen and that includes going back to the days of McNamee, Hunter, Harris and Storey.

Let's just hope FA grow some balls and give a punishment that the challenge deserves, I'd like to think he'd get more than 3 games, Wigan get compulsory relegation and Whelan gets £100 worth of vouchers for Sports Direct.
 
It really did look bad, and to most of us it looked as if he intentionally meant to take Haidara out of the game.
 

Attachments

  • New TOON v Wigan 17th Mar. 010.jpg
    New TOON v Wigan 17th Mar. 010.jpg
    66.7 KB · Views: 4
Just a guess. Maybe not.

Its the most plausible reasoning I have heard. I think Halsey just was not on his game. Just failed to enforce the basic rules and missed key game changing incidents. Like I say although I was raging yesterday, I think as a fan you just have to accept you get these games. We have had probably more bad luck than good luck this season in terms of decisions. Yet we've had more bad luck than good luck with injuries. Last year was the opposite. Swings and roundabouts I suppose.
 
I think that the argument that he's sorry and that there was absolutely no malice involved is a little shallow. He knew from the contact he made that he could have seriously hurt the player, so why did he attempt to play on? Any honest player would surely stop playing and immediately draw attention to the fact that he was writhing around in agony, unable to straighten his leg, and, according to Santon, bleeding quite heavily. If he had any concern for a fellow professional, he wouldn't have chased the ball and would've ensured medical help arrived ASAP.
 
He's a little arsehole just look at the little ****er!!!! he's a scouse little turd and if he'd failed at football he'd be in jail for stabbing smaller children.

If I ever see him he's going in my basement.
 
I think that the argument that he's sorry and that there was absolutely no malice involved is a little shallow. He knew from the contact he made that he could have seriously hurt the player, so why did he attempt to play on? Any honest player would surely stop playing and immediately draw attention to the fact that he was writhing around in agony, unable to straighten his leg, and, according to Santon, bleeding quite heavily. If he had any concern for a fellow professional, he wouldn't have chased the ball and would've ensured medical help arrived ASAP.

Absolute bollocks. Knew exactly what he was doing. If he had lunged but not been looking I'd have said ok, but it was just a reckless challenge designed to hurt someone. Absolute scum who'll hopefully get his. As you say, he knew what contact he made so it renders his pleas a little fake to say the least. Pure malice and he can stick his apology up his arse.
 
Absolute bollocks. Knew exactly what he was doing. If he had lunged but not been looking I'd have said ok, but it was just a reckless challenge designed to hurt someone. Absolute scum who'll hopefully get his. As you say, he knew what contact he made so it renders his pleas a little fake to say the least. Pure malice and he can stick his apology up his arse.

Well **** me sideways we actually agree on something mate.

I think I'm going to have to read the label on this new packet of multi vitamins.
 
The little **** **** knew exactly what he had done. I only hope he gets snapped in half next season at St James or most probably, his wretched, used tampon smelling team get relegated. Either way I'm happy but I would prefer the former
 
Dave Whelan is clearly a nutbar:

"The ball was there. Young McManaman went in for the ball and got the ball as clean as a whistle, but in the follow through they collided. The referee saw it all, he had clear view on that."

Senile old bastard

This.

It's become an utter farce from Wigan now...

If the roles had been reversed, Whelan would be looking for the death penalty for our player. <doh>
 
The FA must be deeming the 'tackle' OK since the silence from them today on the situation is deafening. I'll be suprised if they act, loathe to admit one of their incompetent refs was wrong and since it was against us can't see them acting. I was gutted that tiote didn't snap the boy in half later in the game, I was waiting for it, Carver should have knocked him clean out. If Halsey is ever given a game at SJP there will be hell on, I'd refuse to play the game with him officiating since he's clearyl shown a lack of ability and willingness to protect our players from career ending tackles. His vision was blocked is a crap excuse, we all heard the scream and is it not his job to be well positioned to see incidents. He ought to be never allowed to ref again.
 
The Football Association will study all the available TV footage of Wigan's Callum McManaman's challenge on Newcastle's Massadio Haïdara before deciding if retrospective action can be brought against the 21-year-old.

The FA disciplinary officials are also waiting for the report of the referee, Mark Halsey, before making a decision. Usually, on-the-ball incidents cannot be dealt with retrospectively as it is seen as challenging the opinion of the referee.

If however, Halsey reports he did not see the studs-up lunge by McManaman because he was unsighted then there is the possibility the Wigan player could be charged.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.