question for athiests

so conjecture and guess work? as in 'IF'? as I said assumption

not really interesting, and further proof of your lack of knowledge regarding Islam tbh

you asked in relation to Bush and Blair right? then the answer is NO

more generalisations etc

 

only one way to find out isnt there?

yes grow a pair,
and another assumption reagrding not reading a wikki link etc?

no substance, all talk

 

thanks for your input

seems you had already made up your mind

how does someone ask a question then run away without an answer, then reach a conclusion?

 

In Kyle's Britain, religious fundamentalism would be outlawed, as it binds those who follow religion to one set of views. Aetheists can see the bigger picture, fundamentalists trot out the same tired, overused arguments.

 

My pleasure PNP.
I'm not too au fait with this site and how it works yet, was it you who closed the last thread re: Olympic Stadium?

 

There's no assumption.
What am I assuming?

So you're disagreeing with your fellow Muslims now?
I guess god only talks to you and your convicted mates, eh?

What generalisations?
This is the same thing as your claim of refutations of the evolution of the eye.
More claims without substance.

No.
I have no interest in wasting my time on something that's highly likely to have no substance behind it.

You clearly don't read anything that's posted on here as a link, as you barely read people's replies and consistently display ignorance of repeated arguments.

 

what about athiest fundamentalism?

 

A figment of your (wild) imagination.

 

I'm banning fundamentalism of all kinds. I hate people (like you) who don't take a look at the world, they just focus on one thing.

 

Nah, he does (for once) have a point. I know fundamentalist aetheists. At least i can listen to the views of a religious madman, i don't believe or agree with them, but i listen anyway.

 

If inferrs conjecture and guess work = assumption

No just you, as you asked a specific question but googled a general response. showing a lack of knowledge of Islam in these matters

As i said generalisations.

Oh good come back with the 'no substance'

You have no interest because you have no conviction in your beliefs/assertions
It stands to reason that a man asserting something, on given the opportunity to clarify from source would be delighted

you just a wuss imo

 

come on?

tbf It is related to the thread

I gave some good advice on the DIY thread

so it is in context

I am not fundamentalist, I have a view and am not afraid to stand by it

 

It wasn't me, but I've sent you a fuller answer via private message.
It's in your notifications bit at the top.

 

see that is fair, apart from the madman bit imo

As i said this was to see what athiests would come up with to explain origin etc
but it seems the are more comfortable attacking religion

and to be fair I am not as abusive and rude as some. am I?

 

No it doesn't.

Do you ever actually post answer?
You just consistently claim that people are wrong without even attempting to back up what you're claiming.

You've yet to give me a single reason why Choudary would choose to answer me but not the rest of the tax-payers that he's scrounging from.
That's even giving you the benefit of the doubt for your claims that you know him.

 

People have answered your dodgy question repeatedly.
Questioning religion is not attacking it.

 

Who have they bombed? How many churches, mosques or synagogues have they burnt down? How many theists have they maimed and tortured?

 

yes it does

but you are the font of knowledge re Islam no? you should know
I just want to see if you can back up your assumptions and claims. If you dont know I will enlighten you

Only one way to find out, I have assured you. nothing more I can do

convictions in your assumptions/assertions/beliefs?

didnt think so

 

conviction?

 

wasnt stalin athiest?