there is no PROOF that they did
we dont even know if the had genitalia
So does that mean the babies just popped into existence? What's your take on it?
there is no PROOF that they did
we dont even know if the had genitalia
All the stuff you provided as 'proof' has been debunked
If you dont know what I am asking then why have you been responding with so called 'evidences' and not simply asking for clarification
As i said I want to know about the source/origin/creation of the universe. You phrase it to fat you feel fits
and we will start from there
There is a youtube clip where he does answer the question. He is being interviewed by a woman
what did this mean then
Yes, based upon what we know, matter and energy just exist and do not have an overall source.
So does that mean the babies just popped into existence? What's your take on it?
I'm sure you'll have no problem posting it on here, then.
But is it going to go up Mrs Crocs chuff? oTHERWISE No proof
I asked this in the original question, but you've ignored it, so I'll ask it again.
What has been debunked?
By who and what have they said?
You seem to think that just claiming that something has been debunked is proof, for some reason.
I asked you to clarify the question in my first response.
You still haven't asked a coherent question, though.
Are you asking how the universe started?
We don't know that it did.
We have an idea of what happened some time after the big bang, but we currently have no idea what happened immediately after it or at any point beforehand.
I tried google and bing images for croc sex, croc penis, croc ****, croc swingers, croc singles, croc oral, group croc, croc fetish and bondage, lesbian and gay croc, croc snuff, oriental croc, black on white croc, tranny croc, ladyboy croc, and several other variations but despite some rather suprising and often disturbing results, I found no close up of croc penis penetrating croc ****![]()
simply put all your 'proof' has been answered
I have asked you to rphrase the question
based on what we know, we can conclude everything has a source/origin/creator?
Is there some claim there about anything appearing?
I don't see it.
What's to say that matter and energy haven't always existed?
You must log in or register to see images
why this is relevant on this thread I dont know
but anyway. By the way the interviewer is Tony Blairs sister in law
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70zBFdjKfuY

Only at the macroscopic level. Why can't you get it into your head that things act differently at the atomic level?
He refuses to discuss his employment and says that he's not claiming job-seeker's allowance.
This is because he has a non-job and claims income support.
He justifies this by claiming that this money comes from Allah, to avoid accusations of hypocrisy.
Unless Allah pays tax in Britain, he's clearly talking out of his arse.
I did like the bit where he said, "We don't take any money from the government", before realising that this was totally wrong and adding, "in order to have an agenda against Islam or Muslims", though!
Very funny!![]()
simply put all your 'proof' has been answered
based on what we know, we can conclude everything has a source/origin/creator?
Because the fact they had babies is pretty convincing evidence. Sometimes we cant have "proof" and have to make a judgement based on the preponderance of evidence.
If the proof that I've posted has been countered, then feel free to link to those debunking it.
Why aren't you doing that?
No, we can't conclude that and I've explained why not.
Do you believe that Muslims will rule the World, and Kaffers <not the SA Kind> will convert to Islam or be killed at the hands of the merciful overlords? UK will live under Sharia law and men that refuse to grow beards beaten? Women that don t cover their faces or drive systematically beaten?