I'm not defending the SMT,but there is a question if not them- who? They managed to persuade/con the owners into putting their hard-earned into the club at a time when TS was desperate to offload and there wasn't a queue of potential investors lined up desperate to acquire ownership of our club. We don't know what sort of relationship the SMT have with the owners. If they sacked the SMT would they feel able to find a new improved CEO while living abroad? I don't know what role Andy Scott has at the club any more, and presumably he wouldn't be missed, but CM is also a shareholder, so he's going to be hard to dislodge. Or the owners could decide it's not the fault of the SMT, football is a mug's game, why throw good money after bad? And if that happens that queue of buyers isn't going to magically appear. That's how I see it.