Do you think it’s possible to keep the GK debate limited to ONE thread – it seems to be ‘rearing its ugly head’ on more and more threads??
Whilst I agree that it is CRUCIAL we get a GK who is not going to ship goals for fun, IMO it’s far more important to have a resolute defence, so that the GK isn’t having to make in excess of say 10 saves (ie 10 shots on target) per game and I really think that that responsibility lies with the defence!!!!
From what I’ve seen on clips of our German tour, then the defence is PRIMARILY at fault in the majority of the goals we’ve conceded and they should have dealt with the threats more convincingly. We can but hope that DF and his coaching staff will be working on improving that in the few days they have at Colney prior to heading off to Luton.
PD talks a lot of sense in this article on the topic of both the defence and the GK – ‘
Given Ivo Pinto, Grant Hanley and Jamal Lewis are all to come back into the defensive mix, allied to any number of examples last season when City were
able to successfully repel invaders when they had their backs-to-the-wall, the overall direction of travel feels positive.
Clarity with the keeper situation will come fairly rapidly from this point. DF must decide whether it is Remi Matthews or McGovern who gets the nod for St Andrews, or if a commanding, authoritative presence has to be sourced from outside the current dressing room. ’