Sadly I really don’t think it is.I think this is explosive. Far more serious than yesterday.
I am starting to think this could be a Nixon moment. It is the beginning of the end for this administration.
Sadly I really don’t think it is.
They have too big a majority and they will just sweep under the carpet. Most MAGA idiots will think it’s nothing.
I know the government comes across as idiotic and crass but I think there’s something very insidious happening in the background. They are not all idiots
Someone earning £150 grand is already paying tax on that income. These are not the revenue sources Gary Stevenson is arguing that the government should be targeting. A tax on the assets of the rich, on second, third, and multiple homes, is not a tax on earned income, it’s a tax on wealth that otherwise contributes nothing to the economy.
Just to repeat once again, the rich and poor pay the exact same tax on the exact same income. The more you earn, the more the extra money you earn is taxed. There is no benefit to working hard and being poor.Nail on head. At first glance I agreed with Os post. At first glance. Once you think about it Archer's is fairer.
Earning £150k is a good income and yes, heavily taxed. I agree to tax no more on income, but on the wealth that contributes nothing like multiple homes. There is an argument that the rich will leave, but I think that is more on income tax than other taxes.
Gary Stevenson’s main point on taxing assets is that the more things, the more houses, the more land the super-rich own, the less there is to go round. The assets of the nation are eventually priced out of the range of ordinary people. So taxing assets directly helps ordinary people because it discourages the hoarding of assets and eventually will lower property prices.Nail on head. At first glance I agreed with Os post. At first glance. Once you think about it Archer's is fairer.
Earning £150k is a good income and yes, heavily taxed. I agree to tax no more on income, but on the wealth that contributes nothing like multiple homes. There is an argument that the rich will leave, but I think that is more on income tax than other taxes.
Gary Stevenson’s main point on taxing assets is that the more things, the more houses, the more land the super-rich own, the less there is to go round. The assets of the nation are eventually priced out of the range of ordinary people. So taxing assets directly helps ordinary people because it discourages the hoarding of assets and eventually will lower property prices.
Lock him up!This looks like prison for Hegseth to me
I find it shocking that most of the public would like to see some kind of taxation increase aimed at the wealthy but that Labour seem committed to more austerity politics.It’s worth bearing in mind that the Spring Statement is essentially a spending review. November’s Budget is when tax raises will next be under consideration.
I find it shocking that most of the public would like to see some kind of taxation increase aimed at the wealthy but that Labour seem committed to more austerity politics.
Well where are the taxes? As someone said on Question Time last week, the country needs something radical and we are getting ploddingly pedestrian policies.So do many people, but you've missed the point; this isn't an either/or situation.
Well where are the taxes? As someone said on Question Time last week, the country needs something radical and we are getting ploddingly pedestrian policies.