There is a difference between not appreciating the difference between free speech and hate speech and being a racist. I've said this before on this thread: you can't accuse someone of racism based on someone's view on free speech! I don't agree with his views at all but I've seen nothing to suggest his views are racist. All I can see is that Os thinks anyone can speak their mind, whatever their views, without threat of prosecution. I'm not sure how you stretch that into accusing him into being a racist, but I would appreciate it if you refrained from accusing people of being racist without any hard evidence. Thanks.
You have misread it. I am saying if you don’t want to fall foul of the law, don’t be racist.
That would require not wanting to use the article to push a particular agenda.
There is polling out now about how 60% of the country don’t care who their next leader is. Indication that they perhaps aren’t considered viable at all at the moment : https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/james-c...ke-good-tory-leader-3-in-5-say-they-dont-care
The Tory party was always the party of standards, old fashioned values and standards (except for all the sleaze).
Fortunately yours is very much a minority view inside the UK and overseas. Steps taken like cancelling the Rwanda fiasco, fast tracking foreign prisoner deportations, increasing early non violent prisoner release plus apprehending and sentencing violent rioters and online hate speech posters. This along with confirming adherence to international treaties and moving towards a closer relationship with the EU, seen as a breath of fresh air from this side of ditch. All bodes well for a return to a position of respect in the international community.
Another right winger with wafer thin skin. I guess she must have thought the whole thing was a stitch up which is why she stormed off
