Off Topic Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
It won’t be. Even if it is it’ll be a pledge kicked down the road again! There’s no guarantee they’ll win anyway, let alone get a working majority. The present situation is a mess, I totally agree but having a general election or a referendum or both, is not the answer. The MP’s and the Government have to sort this out, that’s what they’re paid to do. It’s a faint hope but just maybe some common sense will come about here and in the EU and bring about a solution.


Its a complete mess. Of that majority who voted no to the deal? How many of them voted against because it wasn't close enough to Europe and how many because it wasn't far enough? How many voted no because they think they will get into government with a general election. How many voted for it because they wanted to agree to the will of the people. Its such a massive **** up so many vested interests! I'm about to start a new job, hope they don't pull the offer.
 
Opinion polls are one of those things that people seem to question only when they disagree with the speaker's views. By all means take them with a pinch of salt if you choose (though they tend to hit within their mergins of error) but one area they tend to be *eerily* accurate on is how much opinion is changing on a subject.

Paddy Ashdown offered to eat his hat because he *didn't* believe a poll that turned out to be right.

Vin
Fair enough and thank you for correcting me. We will have to see. if remain wins a second ref then so be it.
 
Something we agree on. I was only discussing this this weekend. Why not move Government departments out of London? Free up prime buildings for commerce or (God forbid) conversion to human habitation.

In return, Grimsby, Morecambe, Accrington or wherever, gets a bundle of jobs and all of the employees spend their wages in local businesses, multiplying the effect. London doesn't need the stimulus, towns outside the South East do.

Vin

You'll hate this but I agree. You'll hate more that Patrick O' Flynn (ex UKIP) tweeted exactly this earlier today:
You must log in or register to see media
 
It depends how the referendum is done. I still think it will be very close if we just have the ambiguous yes or no but I think it will be far more in remain's favour of you actually define what leave means by choosing between no deal and mays deal first.

The first Ref asked the key question in or out. There has been no change in the fundamental position of voters as it is a binary choice, the second Ref should ask how - May's deal or no deal
 
You must log in or register to see media

Vin

Parliament did not "drag her in." She decided to grandstand. She didn't ask for a pairing. She has made a show of this when the reality is pairing or not this bill would be defeated heavily. But hey. The soundbites work.
 
Parliament did not "drag her in." She decided to grandstand. She didn't ask for a pairing. She has made a show of this when the reality is pairing or not this bill would be defeated heavily. But hey. The soundbites work.

Once again you've completely missed the point. This government already has form (during this parliament) on breaking pairing for their own benefit so why would anyone trust them to do so in this case? Did Guido forget to mention that?

Vin
 
You'll hate this but I agree. You'll hate more that Patrick O' Flynn (ex UKIP) tweeted exactly this earlier today:
You must log in or register to see media

Yes, i've worked on the decentralisation projects in Government - unfortunately departments are coming out but are relocating in the South, Not exactly helping the North!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ImpSaint
Your first line suggests your missing a lot of whats going on. the contracts are to help the shipping companies that will need to expand to help alleviate the throughput issues in Dover and the Southern ports (not just Dover, land transport uses ferries from many southern ports) creating a need for shipping transport from more northerly ports. As this is a net negative for the country the government needed to cover it or the economy would suffer thus the contracts.


You can say this is helping the north so its fine for you but if the south takes a similiar line of thought in its actions then it just ends up hurting everybody and benefiting noone.


Edit: missed the vote outcome because i was replying to imps. *hangs head in shame*

No I am not missing it. Those contracts have only recently been handed out. Grimsby / Immingham are already talking about gains they have already made from expansion before contracts were handed out. Nothing to do with "alleviating" issues Dover has. All about taking the business permanently. They aren't talking about "helping out." The boss in his news interview was talking about taking advantage of opportunities.
 
Its a complete mess. Of that majority who voted no to the deal? How many of them voted against because it wasn't close enough to Europe and how many because it wasn't far enough? How many voted no because they think they will get into government with a general election. How many voted for it because they wanted to agree to the will of the people. Its such a massive **** up so many vested interests! I'm about to start a new job, hope they don't pull the offer.

Most of those that voted FOR will be on the government payroll, just like most of those that voted for May as leader were on her payroll. Very similar numbers. Ministers, PPSs, anybody that hasn't resigned will almost certainly voted FOR the deal.
 
Time's running out for a referendum, too. What needs to happen is:

- An application for an Article 50 extension of, I dunno, a year.
- A general election.
- That new government to try, and fail, to negotiate a sweetheart deal.
- A second referendum.

In that order. Because right now, with this defeat, there's nothing to hold a second referendum on; that should only take place when there's an actual deal negotiated, because otherwise you get back into the land of wishful thinking.
 
You want me to stop labelling you alt-right? Stop subscribing to daft alt-right conspiracy theories for a start.

Vin

Label me what you want. The problem is that you think everything that doesn't agree with what "we" are being told by the educated lot of "influencers" is a conspiracy theorist.

We shall see if the "forecasts" are right this month, next month, next quarter. One day they'll be somewhere in the ball park and we'll hear "see the experts told us" ignoring the raft of past incorrect ones (including the current ones.) And if China/US tip us into a global recession then of course we'll get the "because Brexit."

Yet I am the conspiracy theorist!
 
Most of those that voted FOR will be on the government payroll, just like most of those that voted for May as leader were on her payroll. Very similar numbers. Ministers, PPSs, anybody that hasn't resigned will almost certainly voted FOR the deal.

With respect you do talk utter utter drivel sometimes. There will be self-serving members on both sides of the fence.
 
The first Ref asked the key question in or out. There has been no change in the fundamental position of voters as it is a binary choice, the second Ref should ask how - May's deal or no deal
The result of which would create a change the fundamental position of voters as to leave and remain so that would need to be asked again too. thus the need for an AV vote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AberdeenSaint