It won’t be. Even if it is it’ll be a pledge kicked down the road again! There’s no guarantee they’ll win anyway, let alone get a working majority. The present situation is a mess, I totally agree but having a general election or a referendum or both, is not the answer. The MP’s and the Government have to sort this out, that’s what they’re paid to do. It’s a faint hope but just maybe some common sense will come about here and in the EU and bring about a solution.
Fair enough and thank you for correcting me. We will have to see. if remain wins a second ref then so be it.Opinion polls are one of those things that people seem to question only when they disagree with the speaker's views. By all means take them with a pinch of salt if you choose (though they tend to hit within their mergins of error) but one area they tend to be *eerily* accurate on is how much opinion is changing on a subject.
Paddy Ashdown offered to eat his hat because he *didn't* believe a poll that turned out to be right.
Vin
blah, blah, blah... collaborating ... blah, blah, blah
Fair enough and thank you for correcting me. We will have to see. if remain wins a second ref then so be it.
Something we agree on. I was only discussing this this weekend. Why not move Government departments out of London? Free up prime buildings for commerce or (God forbid) conversion to human habitation.
In return, Grimsby, Morecambe, Accrington or wherever, gets a bundle of jobs and all of the employees spend their wages in local businesses, multiplying the effect. London doesn't need the stimulus, towns outside the South East do.
Vin
It depends how the referendum is done. I still think it will be very close if we just have the ambiguous yes or no but I think it will be far more in remain's favour of you actually define what leave means by choosing between no deal and mays deal first.
You must log in or register to see media
Vin
The Opinion I am hearing more and more is basically " Who do the EU think they are , trying to bully us " , F**k em , I'm voting leave .
Parliament did not "drag her in." She decided to grandstand. She didn't ask for a pairing. She has made a show of this when the reality is pairing or not this bill would be defeated heavily. But hey. The soundbites work.
You'll hate this but I agree. You'll hate more that Patrick O' Flynn (ex UKIP) tweeted exactly this earlier today:
You must log in or register to see media
Your first line suggests your missing a lot of whats going on. the contracts are to help the shipping companies that will need to expand to help alleviate the throughput issues in Dover and the Southern ports (not just Dover, land transport uses ferries from many southern ports) creating a need for shipping transport from more northerly ports. As this is a net negative for the country the government needed to cover it or the economy would suffer thus the contracts.
You can say this is helping the north so its fine for you but if the south takes a similiar line of thought in its actions then it just ends up hurting everybody and benefiting noone.
Edit: missed the vote outcome because i was replying to imps. *hangs head in shame*
Its a complete mess. Of that majority who voted no to the deal? How many of them voted against because it wasn't close enough to Europe and how many because it wasn't far enough? How many voted no because they think they will get into government with a general election. How many voted for it because they wanted to agree to the will of the people. Its such a massive **** up so many vested interests! I'm about to start a new job, hope they don't pull the offer.
You want me to stop labelling you alt-right? Stop subscribing to daft alt-right conspiracy theories for a start.
Vin
Most of those that voted FOR will be on the government payroll, just like most of those that voted for May as leader were on her payroll. Very similar numbers. Ministers, PPSs, anybody that hasn't resigned will almost certainly voted FOR the deal.
The result of which would create a change the fundamental position of voters as to leave and remain so that would need to be asked again too. thus the need for an AV vote.The first Ref asked the key question in or out. There has been no change in the fundamental position of voters as it is a binary choice, the second Ref should ask how - May's deal or no deal