That's fair enough. Although your talk of "invisible friends" suggests rather stronger feelings on the matter. I would consider you an agnostic though. There's little point to using one term that covers two distinctly different positions. I also suspect you mean proof rather than evidence because there's plenty of evidence for the existence of God. Just immediately I can cite the Gospels, with their descriptions of miracles performed by a man claiming to be the son of God, as evidence for the existence of God. They're not conclusive evidence, they're not proof - and many people will take the view that they're not very strong evidence - but they are unquestionably evidence. There have been many others arguments made over the years for the existence of God as well. So I don't think you can say there is no evidence.One definition of atheism is "lack of belief in the existence of god or gods". That's where I sit. No evidence, so I don't believe it. I also have a lack of belief in fairies, leprechauns or alien abductions. No evidence, so I don't believe them. The onus of proof lies with the one making the claim.
Religions are unquestionably flawed. They're run by humans and humans are flawed. Religions can be and are abused. I've seen the argument that the decision of the Church of England to support WW1 and encourage men to volunteer to fight is a major reason why Christianity began to decline in this country.A discussion of morality would be huge but I would suggest that relying on religions* (believed to be over 10,000 currently) to come up with a common morality would be rather hopeful, to say the least. Secular morality could be summed up as "create a world you'd want to live in regardless of how the dice fall on who you are when you're born" would have much more commonality in my opinion.
Vin
*To clarify the scope of the problem, at least one religion specifically condones slavery.
Secularism is rather different to atheism. The fact remains that the few countries where the state has been atheist have on the whole been unpleasant and oppressive so I'm not sure the eradication of religious belief would be a good thing. I also think "create a world you'd want to live in regardless of how the dice fall on who you are when you're born" is a pretty vague statement. Most people, religious or not, would agree with that statement. That's where the agreement would end though - from there on everyone has their own idea what that world looks like and how you would achieve it.
Last edited:
Indeed. We're all Saints fans on this board, I assumed we must all be accustomed to praying for miracles.