Please please be true

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I agree he has to go, but to say he has no ability is absolutely not true. He's a very tidy player when he's in the right place, he'll never get back there here.

He hasn't shown it for us, that's all that matters as far as i'm concerned. 4m would be cracking business for 12m striker in his last year who's done **** all.
 
Gotta agree that a lot of the flak Fletch gets is not remotely to do with ability.

He is a prick, and he does often look disinterested, but maybe that's born of frustration at the appaling service.

I'm with Indi, he is a player with lovely toucha nd ability at times, but his head is so far up his arse now he needs to be moved on.

I'd wager wherever he goes and starts fresh, he'll do well.

He will start of well then he go back to a lazy ****.

All our forwards need to go apart from Defoe.
 
He doesn't hold the ball up well though. He loses the ball. His passing doesn't break the 70% mark, his take on's and heading duels are both way lower than 50%. He may hang to the ball for a few seconds longer due to his physical presence but then he loses possession time and time again. He's not the only one though. Wickham is **** too. We need a striker who actually betters their physical presence and betters their footballing capabilities imo

I refer you to the Arsenal game at the end of last year mate
Graham tbf was a bit of a lost cause going up against Mertesacker and Koscielny however, Fletch replaced him and they struggled for the rest of the game to even get near the ball he was shielding it that well... thats one example anyway

His pass percentage was 69.3%, Defoe's was 79.3%, Wickham 65% and Graham 63%... Therefore Fletch is only bested by Defoe...

In terms of Aerial duels, only Connor Wickham won more on average a game, Graham won half as many on average as Fletch
(Wickham 2.8, Fletch 2.6, Graham 1.3, Defoe 0.1 (Shortarse!)

Wickham, Johnson and Defoe lose possession more than Fletcher does on average in games

Also in terms of winning MOTM awards, he got the joint second most in our team...Pants got 4 and Fletch/PVA got 2...
 
On his day, (which isn't to often now) he's a good player. But his time at SAFC is up..


Plus he is a ****.


Premier League star Steven Fletcher filmed himself spitting on the back of a rickshaw driver taking him on a night out.

Then the shameless £12million Sunderland striker proudly posted a picture of the cabbie’s phlegm-covered jacket on Instagram with the message “Al spit on ya back ya c***.”
 
I'd take 4 as it stands, prefer if we could swap him for someone like. I'd put him towards Matty Phillips like.

Problem with QPR is it will probably mean a massive wage cut(presuming they've learnt some lessons) A prem club ups our chances of actually getting the greedy **** to agree terms. He'll have payments on that hire purchace Lambo. He won't want to hand it back over, we all know his priorities.
 
Problem with QPR is it will probably mean a massive wage cut(presuming they've learnt some lessons) A prem club ups our chances of actually getting the greedy **** to agree terms. He'll have payments on that hire purchace Lambo. He won't want to hand it back over, we all know his priorities.

Fair comment, not something we were realistically gonna attempt anyway.

Just hying Matty Phillips back out there randomly cos I really think he'd be class with Lens & Defoe. Ha.
 
I refer you to the Arsenal game at the end of last year mate
Graham tbf was a bit of a lost cause going up against Mertesacker and Koscielny however, Fletch replaced him and they struggled for the rest of the game to even get near the ball he was shielding it that well... thats one example anyway

His pass percentage was 69.3%, Defoe's was 79.3%, Wickham 65% and Graham 63%... Therefore Fletch is only bested by Defoe...

In terms of Aerial duels, only Connor Wickham won more on average a game, Graham won half as many on average as Fletch
(Wickham 2.8, Fletch 2.6, Graham 1.3, Defoe 0.1 (Shortarse!)

Wickham, Johnson and Defoe lose possession more than Fletcher does on average in games

Also in terms of winning MOTM awards, he got the joint second most in our team...Pants got 4 and Fletch/PVA got 2...

Yeah mate but regardless of competition from team mates(I'm in the sell the lot stance), it's not good enough for the modern game. Don't like polished turd competitions. Fletch Graham and Wickham are all a long long way short of the required standard. They're getting dicked on by the type of player who never has a high passing % the poacher who hangs of the last man Defoe. Defoe should be the worst but he's the best, he's an old dog who's been dropped to an unfamiliar forward role and he's still beating them.

Polished turd comps aren't for me. Move the lot on starting wherever, and by the time we get rid of those three it will be about time to shift Defoe on too, providing we shift them gradually and don't go for wholesale changes which thankfully it doesn't look like we're doing. Get shot of the lot, two this summer, one the next, Defoe the season after where he'll be spent. I won't defend ****e because he's better than other pieces of ****e. Fletch and Graham in the last year, it's a no brainer they're the two to move on now imo.
 
Fair comment, not something we were realistically gonna attempt anyway.

Just hying Matty Phillips back out there randomly cos I really think he'd be class with Lens & Defoe. Ha.

I'd love Matty Phillips here mate. Stayed at clubs where he'll get game time. Teaches Sinclar a thing or two about who to manage a career. Phillips probably earned just as much at QPR anarl.
 
Yeah mate but regardless of competition from team mates(I'm in the sell the lot stance), it's not good enough for the modern game. Don't like polished turd competitions. Fletch Graham and Wickham are all a long long way short of the required standard. They're getting dicked on by the type of player who never has a high passing % the poacher who hangs of the last man Defoe. Defoe should be the worst but he's the best, he's an old dog who's been dropped to an unfamiliar forward role and he's still beating them.

Polished turd comps aren't for me. Move the lot on starting wherever, and by the time we get rid of those three it will be about time to shift Defoe on too, providing we shift them gradually and don't go for wholesale changes which thankfully it doesn't look like we're doing. Get shot of the lot, two this summer, one the next, Defoe the season after where he'll be spent. I won't defend ****e because he's better than other pieces of ****e. Fletch and Graham in the last year, it's a no brainer they're the two to move on now imo.

Yes but my original point was the case of, Fletcher, including the rest of the strikers have to feed off scraps...

There is no creativity in the midfield, the strikers are having to fashion there own chances

Dont get me wrong they arent the best players in the world, but imo Fletch is worth more than £4m and doesnt deserve half the jip he gets

Especially when looking at the stats he is our second best striker...
 
I think we need to get rid of this lad as soon as possible, he's had more than enough chances but he frequently looks disinterested and generally ****e. He's not very good as a target man, he hasn't looked like a goalscorer since his first few months at the club and is far too slow and lazy to be anything else. I'd love to think that he can turn it around and find some of his initial form for us but I just don't see it happening so we need to get whatever we can for him and send the big lugged **** packing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makemstine Roger
I think we need to get rid of this lad as soon as possible, he's had more than enough chances but he frequently looks disinterested and generally ****e. He's not very good as a target man, he hasn't looked like a goalscorer since his first few months at the club and is far too slow and lazy to be anything else. I'd love to think that he can turn it around and find some of his initial form for us but I just don't see it happening so we need to get whatever we can for him and send the big lugged **** packing.

<laugh>.
 
Yes but my original point was the case of, Fletcher, including the rest of the strikers have to feed off scraps...

There is no creativity in the midfield, the strikers are having to fashion there own chances

Dont get me wrong they arent the best players in the world, but imo Fletch is worth more than £4m and doesnt deserve half the jip he gets

Especially when looking at the stats he is our second best striker...

I know fella, and my point was in regards to that, when that happens they need to be able to help the team out as unit, when they drop deep to help out because they're not getting the service, they're not good enough footballers to do that. Strikers need to provide as well as score, that's why so few strikers hit 10 in a season, because the game has changed and forwards require a good all round game, ours don't. Strikers need to trigger attacking moves, not just finish them, they come up short in that area so they're in fact contributing themselves to the lack of chances we get. How many goals come from the forward dropping deep and providing for the players who run on ahead, How often do you see the likes of Bony, Lakuku, Costa, Bentake drop into their own half using their power and presence to contribute to build up. Our forwards aren't capable of that, but that's what's required these days imo.
 
Not sure why Fletch gets as much jip as he does tbh

Literally nothing in terms of creativity in the midfield to help him or any of the other strikers

Graham is **** but at least he is making up for it with his work rate
Defoe has had **** all to work with
Fletcher is technically our best forward, can hold the ball up, bit trickery and his conversion rate is still the highest we have
Wickham has been diabolical due to his decision making


He has been used mainly under MON and Gus as a hold up striker...always having to keep the ball until the rest of the team dawdle up the pitch (which in all fairness I could move quicker than half of them)

If he was to be utilised as an out and out striker and we were able to get some crosses into the box he'd be a superb player, just needs something to feed off

If I am right in thinking he is still level with Dzeko for having the most headed goals in the prem since 2012/13? and that was with an entire season out...
Sorry Indi but I find that bold paragraph so contradictory. How can Defoe have nothing to work with when others aren't good enough? Either none of them have had anything to work with or they are not good enough? Fletcher hasn't looked arsed. Defoe has looked like he's here for a payday to me. Undoubted talent but has 3 goals! Wickham has 2 since Defoe signed as well - poor return from both but a 21/22 year old against "all that experience"? Neither return is good enough. Just an opinion though!
 
I know fella, and my point was in regards to that, when that happens they need to be able to help the team out as unit, when they drop deep to help out because they're not getting the service, they're not good enough footballers to do that. Strikers need to provide as well as score, that's why so few strikers hit 10 in a season, because the game has changed and forwards require a good all round game, ours don't. Strikers need to trigger attacking moves, not just finish them, they come up short in that area so they're in fact contributing themselves to the lack of chances we get. How many goals come from the forward dropping deep and providing for the players who run on ahead, How often do you see the likes of Bony, Lakuku, Costa, Bentake drop into their own half using their power and presence to contribute to build up. Our forwards aren't capable of that, but that's what's required these days imo.

To be fair, this can again be attributed to the poor quality of the midfield runners, the complete lack of ability throughout the side to find space, and the lack of any skilled dribblers ion the side bar PVA, AJ and Giacc.

Bony, Lukaku, Costa, none of them would be able to do anything with the lack of movement around them in the side, we always looked pressed and that is poor pass & move. The midfield is a massive issue and one we simply haven't resolved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makemstine Roger
Sorry Indi but I find that bold paragraph so contradictory. How can Defoe have nothing to work with when others aren't good enough? Either none of them have had anything to work with or they are not good enough? Fletcher hasn't looked arsed. Defoe has looked like he's here for a payday to me. Undoubted talent but has 3 goals! Wickham has 2 since Defoe signed as well - poor return from both but a 21/22 year old against "all that experience"? Neither return is good enough. Just an opinion though!

Defoe is regarded as a poacher, therefore is basically there at the end of a move to smash it in

I did say in the sentence above as well that none of them had anything to work with

The main problem in the side is as I said "Literally nothing in terms of creativity in the midfield to help him or any of the other strikers"

We need more creative midfielders
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusblackcat