You said it for me ! It's hard telling it like it is but someone has to do it.
Me and Bano are handing the baton on to you. Cheers
You said it for me ! It's hard telling it like it is but someone has to do it.
Do you know how a business actually works?
Ashley has hired Llambias as managing director to run the club. An owner hires a MD so he doesn't have to make any decisions, because the MD calls the shots.
Ashley would not hire a managing director and then undo Llambias' authority by overturning the decisions he makes. I'm a very firm believer that the decisions and the strategies the club is making is entirely down to Llambias.
I would hope so, as I am a partner in one.
Who says that Ashley would be undermining Llambias' authority by overtaking decisions he has made? The decisions will be joint ones, but with Ashley having the final say. Who says so? Alan Pardew; that's who.
As for the "decisons and strategies" the club is making, I'm a firm believer that they are for the financial betterment of Ashley's business empire and nothing else. Why should we expect that they should be for any other reason? Ashley is a former county squash player from Hertfordshire, with no previous links with football or the North East.
Well I'll be proved correct and once again.
Well, you're obviously not, otherwise you would understand that the MD is there to manage the business - especially when the owner is a billionaire with many other businesses in a giant portfolio.
Who says it? It's just a fact. You hire an MD to take control of the business. If the owner overrides any of the managing directors decisions, then he's undermining his authority in a big way.
Right, so why does that conflict with the notion that Llambias is calling the shots? Ashley sees the club as a business, and Llambias has been hired by Ashley as an MD with business management experience. Ashley obviously has a vague target which he wants Llambias to achieve, so when Llambias formulates his tactics, his rules and his strategies, Ashley will let him do what he's there for.
Whilst Ashley controls the overall direction of the club, it will be Llambias calling the shots on day-to-day activities. This means that if Ashley wanted to invest a little bit of his cash on a few players, he's likely to avoid undermining the plan Llambias has put in place.
I honestly believe that Ashley is likely to get quite excited by the football, and perhaps tempted to invest more money when he sees potential. However, Llambias is the hard-nosed business manager who will always be bending Ashley's ear and keeping everything so rigid.
I am a partner in a business, on Teesside, and we haven't gone bust yet, so we must be doing something right!!
Let me get this straight.
So if Saylor wasn't injured, we wouldn't buy anyone in January according to logic?
Didn't Lambarse say we would definitely get a striker in January anyway?
My optimistic side says this could be mind games or some crap like that, but I doubt it.
I am a partner in a business, on Teesside, and we haven't gone bust yet, so we must be doing something right!!
I see no point in continuing a debate with someone who doesn't know me from Adam, but feels capable of effectively caling me a liar. As for your point of view, it is purely based on conjecture, as you have no better idea than me as to how the NUFC business model is set up.
I do know that at the Boro, Steve Gibson installed an employee he could trust, called Keith Lamb, as MD, but Gibson called the shots, especially when it came to signing players. Why should that not be the case with NUFC, especially when Llambias's background is in running casinos, not anythinh to do with football.
We'll see what transpires, shall we?
Let me get this straight.
So if Saylor wasn't injured, we wouldn't buy anyone in January according to logic?
Didn't Lambarse say we would definitely get a striker in January anyway?
My optimistic side says this could be mind games or some crap like that, but I doubt it.
Let me get this straight.
So if Saylor wasn't injured, we wouldn't buy anyone in January according to logic?
Didn't Lambarse say we would definitely get a striker in January anyway?
My optimistic side says this could be mind games or some crap like that, but I doubt it.
Well I'll be proved correct and once again.
Hang on matey, what happened to your mackem avatar?
What mackem avatar?![]()
What's this about you being an unwashed? Here's me thinking you were a Toon lad????????

The conclusion is that the owner wont spend money on two players, it was either going to be a striker or a defender and now Saylor is out - its going to be a defender. Strange since Lover is leaving in Jan.
What date did Saylor get injured and what date did Maiga 'fail a medical?'.
A very, very poor way to run a football club. If Ba gets injured soon where are the goals going to come from? Best? Shola? Haha, we would slide down the table rapidly and then you'd all be 'bashing Ashley'.
Agreed, imagine if HBA picks up an injury while Ba is away. I think a lot of people will change their tune.