Off Topic P&O

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
P&O are said to have about 4000 staff nationwide. It'd be interesting to know what the saving is, nationwide, by replacing 800 of them.

Guessing they feel it's enough to increase profitability and in turn save the business
 
Guessing they feel it's enough to increase profitability and in turn save the business
If they were just losing 800 positions then yes you'd think that but no, they're being replaced. How much cheaper can overseas labour be? Although I suppose if they're employing the labour in a different country it might be significant, if that's what they're doing.
 
Most organisations I have worked for could easily lose 20-30% of the highest paid staff with no loss of efficiency, just by some sensible reorganisation. If you do this first, the lower paid employees realise that economies are necessary. How about the chief executive giving back his bonuses for the last 5 years?
 
Have they made a £100m loss or are their profits down £100m year on year?

Genuine question, no idea.

They made a £20m loss in their last filed accounts, but are only half way through their next accounting year, so nobody knows how much they're losing currently (other than them obviously).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drew
Most organisations I have worked for could easily lose 20-30% of the highest paid staff with no loss of efficiency, just by some sensible reorganisation. If you do this first, the lower paid employees realise that economies are necessary. How about the chief executive giving back his bonuses for the last 5 years?

True. Same in my past experiences. But, P&O have been struggling for years, so such re-organisations have likely already been done, hence the decision to now go for this 'nuclear' option.
As for the parent group or other parts of the wider organisation being profitable, unfortunately that's irrelevant - business just doesn't work like that; shareholders / investors / owners aren't ok with it being some sort of charity that allows one part of the group to support non-viable other parts.
 
Businesses are ran for the shareholders these days, the vast majority don’t give a **** about their staff, customers, suppliers etc. As long as the shareholders are fine that’s all that matters. It is a disgrace.

They took £10m in furlough, asked the Government for a £150m contribution to a £250m bailout, yet DP World still gave themselves dividends of £250m. Yes, DP World are the parent and not directly P&O, but it shouldn’t be allowed.
 
Use the route regularly, been at about 15-20 % capacity for a while post covid. Having to drive down to the tunnel then home but that's nothing compared to losing your job, poor sods. Suspect it'll end up with 1 passenger ferry and probably a freight ferry. Shame if it goes, my favourite option for Netherlands.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SW3 Chelsea Tiger