There's a difference.
For example, at the time I posted that we looked in trouble, and didn't look like we could achieve promotion, which we didn't. I also gave a constructive assessment as to why I felt we needed change.
But this season, we are unbeaten and we have supporters still complaining, it's unjustified. IMO it has to be constructive to be fair.
But whatever my opinion. Would I turn up at the ground to boo PP of the players? No.
"But this season, we are unbeaten and we have supporters still complaining, it's unjustified."
Yeah it's terrible how people can be so quick to complain

Dancingstripes:
"Both observations haunt us in the very first game.
Terrible keeping for the penalty. And we don't have a striker suited to Parkinson's style of football (if you can call it a style)
Why play grigg if you've got absolutely zero creativity in midfield to supply him? He didn't have a single through pass to him yesterday, not even an attempted one.
We were the better side there's no doubt. But if our weaknesses can haunt us against them, we've got no chance of putting together any kind of real consistency to mount a serious challenge.
Either Parkinson will have to be replaced or backed. I know which one I'd choose."
Another total contradiction, calling for the manager to be sacked after one game ...
...not very good at this forum malarkey are you.
Last edited:
