I can understand that but many still see it as a stating point in resolving things. The time may have have gone but realistically I doubt there was ever at time when they would apologise or make any serious attempt at reconciliation. That's bad enough but it wouldn't be quite so bad if they were likely to sell up soon but I'm not holding my breath on that one either.
The regime which Fish fronted and was well paid for, despite him saying he did it for nothing, did nothing to stop the decline of the club. The ground was falling to bits with the team tumbling down the leagues, and no investment in players at all over a substantial period.
Martin Fish didn't give Bunkers to Bradford. He was strong armed into it by Humberside Plod who said they would not police the game if they didn't. (Millwall soon backed down in a dispute with the police when a similar threat was made to them by the police).That would have had severe repercussions for City. In fact the idiot in charge said it was such a good idea as they could park the away coaches and escort fans to the stadium without them encountering home fans it should be made permanent. Wiser heads pointed out how ridiculous that would be for games where one coachful of away fans would be on an area of terracing which held 4,000.
I think it was Bryan Calam who City later employed. The man who whilst lecturing on what dodgy characters football fans were was getting up to some dodgy and seedy things himself in his private life. https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/new...bryan-calam-jailed-humiliating-police-2702031