**** off ............

TheJudeanPeoplesFront said:
I would tend to agree. When I was mod, the only things I deleted were the bloody pharmaceutical advert spambots, though obviously the gross porn posting by sicko members got out of hand for a while. But, in all honesty, I think this board is modded fine now and I don't have any complaints.

I would say bring back Hacky and ACS etc for the derby, but it's your choice. If you can't live with their banter, or stoop to our immaturity for a couple of days, then that's up to you <ok>
Click to expand...

Not up to me. They weren't banned for opinions though, they were banned for sniding behind closed doors, their opinions and banter were welcome. They're too stupid to grasp what they were doing, as mods too. Hacky didn't even know the definition of Moderator and denied it was anything to do being a mediator when it's exactly what it is by definition. He thought and still thinks it about tidying threads alone <doh>

I'll accept whatever our Mods choose but would like to see cross-forum threads for the derby. Even with those two dozy twats, they're too stupid to see how they were out of order, I realise now.

Been over to your board today. Will be popping over a bit more as the match gets closer.
 
The Funkadelic Phallus said:
Not up to me. They weren't banned for opinions though, they were banned for sniding behind closed doors, their opinions and banter were welcome. They're too stupid to grasp what they were doing, as mods too. Hacky didn't even know the definition of Moderator and denied it was anything to do being a mediator when it's exactly what it is by definition. He thought and still thinks it about tidying threads alone <doh>

I'll accept whatever our Mods choose but would like to see cross-forum threads for the derby. Even with those two dozy twats, they're too stupid to see how they were out of order, I realise now.

Been over to your board today. Will be popping over a bit more as the match gets closer.
Click to expand...

Good, the more the merrier <ok>

I can kick your arse on any board you choose mate :smiley-finger007:
 
TheJudeanPeoplesFront said:
<laugh> Hahahahahahaha... You guys clearly don't get jokes do you <laugh>

Smug's IN the top 200 richest men alright... Balls deep <ok>

Howay Durham Stag, you're giving them a caning here <laugh>
Click to expand...

It's like teasing a dog with a treat mate, you have to give in and give it to them eventually or it just becomes cruel, regardless of how funny it is.

Besides, smuginantibes has backtracked more in this thread than a French army, he's had enough embarrassment there's no need to make it any worse <laugh>
 
The Funkadelic Phallus said:
Cest is a ****ing hypocrite mate. He's the worst for starting fights. Only difference is Smug stands by what he says where Cest gets personal and does a runner halfway through the argument he caused and refuses to reply.
Click to expand...

To be fair mate smug has bottled it in this thread, started off with a very blaz-ee (sp) "**** everyone" style and soon tracked back to saying it was "tongue in cheek" when the tables began to be turned on him.
 
Durham Stag said:
To be fair mate smug has bottled it in this thread, started off with a very blaz-ee (sp) "**** everyone" style and soon tracked back to saying it was "tongue in cheek" when the tables began to be turned on him.
Click to expand...

What's that got to do with my comments?

He's stuck with this thread from start to finish, Haven't got a clue if he's been put in his place or not as I haven't been following his conversations, irrelevant to me. But he's still here on his own thread. He isn't ignoring folk to suit him.

for what it's worth If he has indeed been put in his place then it shows him to be a better man then some cause he's still here commenting. As suppose to having cheeky digs and running.
 
Durham Stag said:
It's like teasing a dog with a treat mate, you have to give in and give it to them eventually or it just becomes cruel, regardless of how funny it is.

Besides, smuginantibes has backtracked more in this thread than a French army, he's had enough embarrassment there's no need to make it any worse <laugh>
Click to expand...

As I said earlier, I stand by everything I've said and always do.
 
The Funkadelic Phallus said:
What's that got to do with my comments?

He's stuck with this thread from start to finish, Haven't got a clue if he's been put in his place or not as I haven't been following his conversations, irrelevant to me. But he's still here on his own thread. He isn't ignoring folk to suit him.

for what it's worth If he has indeed been put in his place then it shows him to be a better man then some cause he's still here commenting. As suppose to having cheeky digs and running.
Click to expand...

Because for some reason, in an argument with Cest, you felt the need to compare Cestria to smug. Heaven knows why. I merely countered your point that smug stands by everything he says. His backtracking on this thread to begin claiming that it was all "tongue in cheek" and he was hoping to get a reaction, is cringeworthy and laughable.

As to ignoring people, perhaps he got called away from the internet and back to real life at some point? Also, sometimes posts are so inane and pointless that they aren't worth a reply, like the one from smug just above this. Not saying either of those things are the case here like, they are just possible reasons why he may not have replied. I wouldn't take it as a personal attack <ok>
 
Durham Stag said:
Because for some reason, in an argument with Cest, you felt the need to compare Cestria to smug. Heaven knows why. I merely countered your point that smug stands by everything he says. His backtracking on this thread to begin claiming that it was all "tongue in cheek" and he was hoping to get a reaction, is cringeworthy and laughable.

As to ignoring people, perhaps he got called away from the internet and back to real life at some point? Also, sometimes posts are so inane and pointless that they aren't worth a reply, like the one from smug just above this. Not saying either of those things are the case here like, they are just possible reasons why he may not have replied. I wouldn't take it as a personal attack <ok>
Click to expand...

What the **** has that got to do with you? I'll thank you to **** off and mind your own. You're clearly not up to date with what is going on as it's separate to Smug's OP and has rolled over from other threads over something that has been going on for months and months. Again, **** off! You don't know what you're on about.<ok>:D
 
The Funkadelic Phallus said:
What the **** has that got to do with you? I'll thank you to **** off and mind your own. You're clearly not up to date with what is going on as it's separate to Smug's OP and has rolled over from other threads over something that has been going on for months and months. Again, **** off! You don't know what you're on about.<ok>:D
Click to expand...

I wasn't referring to the argument, but the way you compared him to smug. Is smug like your beacon of ideality, and you use him as a measuring tool against whom all fall short? Cringeworthy for a grown man. I'll take off now and leave you to stew over how much of an embarrassing brown noser you are <laugh> <ok>
 
Fair play Durham stag it's about time someone put smug in his place. I've seen this fraud get away with his fight threats and lies too many times because he has his arse lickers on here. Looks like this time he's bitten off more than he can chew.
 
WearsidePride said:
Fair play Durham stag it's about time someone put smug in his place. I've seen this fraud get away with his fight threats and lies too many times because he has his arse lickers on here. Looks like this time he's bitten off more than he can chew.
Click to expand...

Well it hasn't happened yet and this clown's making a **** job of trying <laugh>

Point out one lie, ever on this board, and I'll stop thinking you're a twat <ok>

As for fight threats ......... the only fights I've ever agreed to are ones that have been offered to me, not the other way round.
Needless to say not one of the yellow ****ers has ever showed up.

2 people, Mags obviously, called me a liar and I offered them a bet to prove it .......... they both clucked, care to make it a hat trick big lad?
 
Durham Stag said:
I wasn't referring to the argument, but the way you compared him to smug. Is smug like your beacon of ideality, and you use him as a measuring tool against whom all fall short? Cringeworthy for a grown man. I'll take off now and leave you to stew over how much of an embarrassing brown noser you are <laugh> <ok>
Click to expand...

Ok tara dickhead!
 
A Northern Soul Disco said:
If people have reasonable suggestions as to how to deal with the lad we'll look at it. For now he's agreed to back off for a bit.

I find this thread and the other as boring as the rest of you.
Click to expand...

I don't understand this mate, I have genuinely enjoyed the JPF posts over these last few pages. He's educated, witty and hasn't done anything to disrupt the board?
 
smuginantibes said:
Well it hasn't happened yet and this clown's making a **** job of trying <laugh>

Point out one lie, ever on this board, and I'll stop thinking you're a twat <ok>

As for fight threats ......... the only fights I've ever agreed to are ones that have been offered to me, not the other way round.
Needless to say not one of the yellow ****ers has ever showed up.

2 people, Mags obviously, called me a liar and I offered them a bet to prove it .......... they both clucked, care to make it a hat trick big lad?
Click to expand...

Do you ever read your posts back? You sound like a 12 year old fella. Does it make you feel big arranging fights that you know are never gonna take place, on an Internet forum. It doesn't really bother me if you are what you say you are. One thing though, if I lived this rich lifestyle you say you do I certainly wouldn't be on a football forum bragging to others about it ;)
 
smuginantibes said:
Well that's me well and truly shown up and put in my place ........ all those lies of mine he pointed out <doh>
Click to expand...

What's the world come to when you can't share opinions on a message board? How many sides would a debate need have for everybody to take an independent stance? <doh> Some times I think them skunks don't have a brain cell between them. You'd think the decent mags would balance it out but it really doesn't.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back