O/T - Abortion

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
name a single issue ever that people were disagreeing about, religion got involved, and then the problem was solved or made better

For somebody who uses the philosophy of logical rationalism to employ the concept of evil as the basis for your tirde against religion semonstrates that you have very little control of your understanding of either philosophy.
 
My problem with religion of any flavour, is that it is like performing any task with a 2000 year old instruction manual. While I concede that some things have the same values as way back then, so many other things are no longer relevant, but because it is in the book....

I also loathe the hypocrites who rise to the top of many religions who twist things to suit their needs.

I believe that the only commandment we should all stick to is to treat others as you would want to be treated.
 
I believe that the only commandment we should all stick to is to treat others as you would want to be treated.

That's the 'Golden Rule', Noblelox. It's an ethical rule that some historians believe predates all religions and has been incorporated, in some form or another, into almost every religion. Christians will know it, amongst other similar quotes, from Luke 6:31: 'Do to others as you would have them do to you.'

I agree it's the cornerstone of all reciprocal ethics, and a very good saying.
 
it's an entirely secular morality too

it frames moral questions entirely in the context as yourself being a human being just like everyone else

it does not promise the reward of heaven or the punishment of hell, and it's validity is not based on claims (argument from authority) that it was said by God or Jesus or some prophet

It is theologically neutral, it's true. It's possibly a 'hardwired' genetic thing for all social animals. That would be my guess ('hypothesis'), and I'm sure it's partly supported by work from Pfaff's lab.
 
That's the 'Golden Rule', Noblelox. It's an ethical rule that some historians believe predates all religions and has been incorporated, in some form or another, into almost every religion. Christians will know it, amongst other similar quotes, from Luke 6:31: 'Do to others as you would have them do to you.'

I agree it's the cornerstone of all reciprocal ethics, and a very good saying.

Unfortunately you pick only one half of the instruction given given to Christians which differentiates them from other religions. As defined in Luke 10.27 "'You must love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, all your strength, and all your mind.' And, 'Love your neighbour as yourself"
 
Unfortunately you pick only one half of the instruction given given to Christians which differentiates them from other religions. As defined in Luke 10.27 "'You must love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, all your strength, and all your mind.' And, 'Love your neighbour as yourself"

Doesn't really add much I'm afraid, Dave. I'm sure if you read the religious texts of other religions there'll be something in them saying pretty much the same thing 'love Allah', etc., etc. The Golden Rule stands on it's own and needs no ancillary instructions. That would be my opinion, obviously.

PS wasn't 'love thy neighbour' in Mark? Or is that passage in both Luke and Mark?
 
evil is a perfectly valid concept for a non religious person.

and religion is a great source of evil.

any sick person can abuse a child, but only a religious person can take it to the next level and then tell that child that if they dare speak about what happened to them they will burn for eternity in the fires of Hell.

As has already been pointed out to you every socio-political philosophy also a great source of evil. So where do you want to go from here?
 
you're right it is a peculiar sickness of Christianity that it demands you distort the concept of love.

you MUST love God, though you must also fear him.

and you are set the IMPOSSIBLE demand of loving strangers as much as yourself and your own family so that you can always be found to be falling short and sinful and deserving of punishment.

If you wish to attack Christianity then you really should do some study first. Your use of the word FEAR demonstrates that you have no understanding of it's biblical meaning. Sure, every Christian will fail to meet the instruction fully. However, falling short does not bring punishment, it actually brings forgiveness.
 
Daniel 12:2
And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt.

Matthew 13:41-42
The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.

Matthew 18:8-9
If thy hand or thy foot offend thee, cut them off, and cast them from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life halt or maimed, rather than having two hands or two feet to be cast into everlasting fire.

Matthew 22:13
Then said the king to the servants, Bind him hand and foot, and take him away, and cast him into outer darkness, there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

Matthew 25:41, 46
Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels. ... And these shall go away into everlasting punishment.

Mark 9:43-48
... into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.

Luke 16:22-24
And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried; And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.

John 5:28-29
The hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.

2 Thessalonians 1:8-9
In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ: Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction.

Revelation 14:10-11
The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever.

Revelation 20:10
And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.

Revelation 20:14-15
And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

Great abstarction. Now put those quotes into context and come back and argue.
 
Dongo, seriously, don't mention him in the same breath! He's never been fit to get within kicking distance, let alone lace up Christopher's boots! <ok>

A great, and partly self inflicted loss, is Christopher.

I find religion interesting as a concept; or rather, the idea of spirituality, of which religion is but an organised form.

It is human nature to try and reconcile life's issues; death, meaning, how and why to survive - and religion over history has been the 'answer' to these questions. Of course, more and more, as we learn more and more, religion is quickly becoming the 'god of the gaps' but that's another debate.

Religion is the fear of death, of the unknown. That very human vulnerability that was essential to our survival. From cave paintings, sun worship to Zeus, Apollo, Seth, Allah or Krishna, they all represent very human desires to be loved, to have answers, to have security and a meaning.

But why should there be a meaning? What if we are all the products of chance flying through an absurd universe in which we play a very small role? When you die it will all mean nothing, and to be honest, all of our lives right now, ultimately, mean nothing. And that's okay.

Final thought on religion, or indeed, Christianity? Well, I only believe in one less god than you do.
 
A great, and partly self inflicted loss, is Christopher.

Indeed. He was an intellectual in the truest sense. He was honest and forthright in all he did -- even when he was wrong. He was an atheist and ardent anti-religionist, but was respected by most of his theological opponents. Most of all he was never boring. ;)

Hitchen's joke: A Buddhist monk goes to a hotdog stall and asks proprietor to 'make me one with everything' :)... He then gives the stall owner $5 and awaits his change. When it's not forthcoming he inquires, 'Sir, what about my change?' 'Ah,' replies the vendor, 'surely true change comes from within.' Class joke. It's the way he tells 'em. <ok>
 
nothing for me to argue, it's your garbage.

Christianity had poisoned minds for centuries with cruel tales of Hell, if you want to now pretend that was "fake" Christianity and yours is the correct one and everyone used to have it wrong but we should now believe you've suddenly got it right then you're just trying to shirk responsibility for outrages levels of suffering.

I would agree in part that Christianity has (through institutions) used the concept of hell for its advantage...

But without it we wouldn't have Dante or Milton... so they got two right! Or indeed JRR Tolkien, a devout Catholic.
 
Indeed. He was an intellectual in the truest sense. He was honest and forthright in all he did -- even when he was wrong. He was an atheist and ardent anti-religionist, but was respected by most of his theological opponents. Most of all he was never boring. ;)

Hitchen's joke: A Buddhist monk goes to a hotdog stall and asks proprietor to 'make me one with everything' :)... He then gives the stall owner $5 and awaits his change. When it's not forthcoming he inquires, 'Sir, what about my change?' 'Ah,' replies the vendor, 'surely true change comes from within.' Class joke. It's the way he tells 'em. <ok>

I loved the way he cut through his opponents. So articulate but very witty.

Pity about the other one.
 
nothing for me to argue, it's your garbage.

Christianity had poisoned minds for centuries with cruel tales of Hell, if you want to now pretend that was "fake" Christianity and yours is the correct one and everyone used to have it wrong but we should now believe you've suddenly got it right then you're just trying to shirk responsibility for outrages levels of suffering.

You won't argue because you can't argue. The evidence that you forwarded was not constructed by you and therefore you cannot put it into context. Perhaps the biggest problem that you have is that you have been unable to differentiate Christianity as a faith from religion. The former is God given, the latter is man made.
 
But why should there be a meaning? What if we are all the products of chance flying through an absurd universe in which we play a very small role? When you die it will all mean nothing, and to be honest, all of our lives right now, ultimately, mean nothing. And that's okay.

It is a peculiarity of man that he requires a purpose for things. The error is that there is no purpose. Purpose is a human construct. Purpose without humanity is pointless. When people say atheism is hollow as it has robbed life of purpose, they have confused cause and effect. There was no purpose to begin with so it could not have been stolen. And, as all other purposes are man-made, your purpose in life can be created to be anything you wish. Men can give their lives whatever purposes they wish. Any glorious purpose from religion can also be followed without religion - except that you have to choose it for yourself.

Final thought on religion, or indeed, Christianity? Well, I only believe in one less god than you do.

That means you believe in -1 gods! ;)<ok>
 
You won't argue because you can't argue. The evidence that you forwarded was not constructed by you and therefore you cannot put it into context. Perhaps the biggest problem that you have is that you have been unable to differentiate Christianity as a faith from religion. The former is God given, the latter is man made.

I would call Christianity a religion as it is attached to the vehicle of churches and institutions by 99% of Christians, who believe in a set text, the Bible. Faith is the means of validating the belief.