Our board claim he was let go because of results, nothing about a breakdown of working relations, which is nonsense as he didn’t have the tools to do the job. That was fine when we didn’t have anything to give him, but after the Scott sale they decided not to give him anything. Then try to claim it’s down to results. We are fed up being fed B/S. I’d have more respect if they said they’d fallen out with him, I might not have liked it, but would have known they were honest. Instead they did what they did to Cotts, hung him out to dry. By the fan’s reaction this time they are seeing through the smoke and mirrors.