If Lansdown only employs yes men, why does the rugby team have Pat Lamb?
He has with the egg chasers, so why not, I know the finances are much higher with football, but the principle of giving control is the sameSeems as if SL doesn't like being dictated to, seems like he likes to have a say towards team affairs, hence why he has Ashton....hence why it seems we don't have coaches that stand up for themselves.....maybe SL is the problem..if that's the case, we won't progress.
Will SL ever employ a coach that will insist on being left alone to do the job required his own way is the question!!
Then that would mean SL has more dealings with Pat Lamb.I am sure I have answered this before.
Because the rugby club don't have to answer to Ashton, he wouldn't last 5 minutes.
Then that would mean SL has more dealings with Pat Lamb.
No idea why bringing Ashton into this proves anything when we are talking about SL only employing yes men.
All you’ve done is show that Lamb won’t take Ashton’s nonsense which means he is further away from being a yes man.
So if SL only employs yes men why has he employed Pat Lamb?
So in that case why do people always say Lansdown only employs yes men. When looking at the rugby proves is not the case.OK SL seemingly does that by proxy by allowing Ashton to only bring in yes men. LJ was and Holden is.
The rugby club have their own CEO ex Bristol rugby player Mark Tainton. If SL allows him to make decisions in the same way that Ashton does, within budgets, the Bobs yer uncle.
Financial and structure between football and rugby are chalk and cheese Ashton. It Didn't take much to turn a troubled Bristol Rugby club into a top outfit. Different ball game regarding the zillions required to turn City into a top outfit. It's like comparing LJ to Messi as a player & Deano to Pepe as a coachHe has with the egg chasers, so why not, I know the finances are much higher with football, but the principle of giving control is the same
So in that case why do people always say Lansdown only employs yes men. When looking at the rugby proves is not the case.
Plus Ashton has only been with us since 2016. Before that he was a consultant on transfer data basis.
If people said Ashton only employs yes man would be more fitting.

I will go with that, great result Cotts, did he shake your or Arron's hand or run away.Little ol Shrewsbury.
We'll done Steve.
Hope that aids your recovery from Covid.![]()

Who cares, they’re both former managers now and nothing to do with BCFC anymore. You need to move on RP and Wiz...Little ol Shrewsbury.
We'll done Steve.
Hope that aids your recovery from Covid.![]()
Ashton recommended to the board and employed both LJ & DH


What you can't make up is 63 players signed, £m's invested, 5 places progress in 4.5 years, you can't make that up,it's fact, the dynamic duo, Ashton & Johnson.Hang on a cotton-picking minute! For 4 years we had RP bleating about how only daddy or 'Uncle Steve' would employ LJ. As I always read it, this formed the basis of Redprintt's nepotism claim; therefore, hatred of LJ? Yet now you're saying that it was actually MA who employed LJ, so not daddy or 'Uncle Steve' at all? Redprintt must feel cheated now, and maybe a touch foolish after all his comments, that now seem unfounded
You couldn't make this up![]()


I think you need to include Lansdown in this equation too and call them the 3 Degrees of FailureWhat you can't make up is 63 players signed, £m's invested, 5 places progress in 4.5 years, you can't make that up,it's fact, the dynamic duo, Ashton & Johnson.![]()
What you can't make up is 63 players signed, £m's invested, 5 places progress in 4.5 years, you can't make that up,it's fact, the dynamic duo, Ashton & Johnson.![]()
Of course you can rely on me, to repudiate your points of view with regard to LJ, I think he was a total failure, he promised Premier league football, he promised European competition in 5 years, he promised a successful team after 3 transfer windows, he flopped, apart from flipped, no promotions, no honours, his record followed the same pattern as with Oldham & Barnsley, broken promises and streaky runs, 5 overall places in 4.5 years, culminating in the sack, nothing invalid about that.That wasn't the point in question though was it, but you can always rely on an anti LJ'er to turn things around when their points are proven invalid!
You are correct on the other points though, (except, at best he improved us 12 places, at worst 7 places since SC left), but as usual, you miss the point about the even more £m's brought into the club than he spent. Another thing you can always rely on anti LJ'er to convienantly overlook![]()
Cotts must have been jumping up and down with joy, the little club he's employed by compared to LJ's Sunderland.....must have felt like a cup shock for him!!!Who cares, they’re both former managers now and nothing to do with BCFC anymore. You need to move on RP and Wiz...
