Sammy AllerdiccioSomeone with a sexy as fûck foreign name
Sammy AllerdiccioSomeone with a sexy as fûck foreign name
I posted it last night, and I'm still thinking it but I'd quite like Duncan Ferguson.
Seems to tick a few boxes with youth coaching etc, certainly a motivator
I’ve got over the shock and reached the ‘**** it we be alright’ stage now.
We aren’t looking for a gaffer in the 3rd tier now, we are looking for a gaffer with a competitive championship squad.
I won’t belittle what Neil has done he’s been ****ing brilliant. I’m gutted he’s going, but he’s absolutely replaceable.
Time for Speakman and the owners to show some proper intent, and they need get these 2 deals over the line as well.
We’ve a game today and I hope that rather than a toxic atmosphere we all get in there and remind the lads they are playing for a special football club.
Sunderland till we die.
absolutely this. For me it’s moved to damage limitation now. If it’s true the players are angry I hope KLD is reassuring them. We need to keep the players we want to keep and we will be fine
I posted it last night, and I'm still thinking it but I'd quite like Duncan Ferguson.
Seems to tick a few boxes with youth coaching etc, certainly a motivator
Pretty sure he left Everton to try and get a number one role as well?Not a bad shout, under the present system we need a coach rather than a manager type.
The club structure has been deliberately designed so that losing the Head Coach isn't such a big deal as losing the Manager. The Head Coach has to fit into the club's structure, not construct it around him. Therefore, losing Alex Neil isn't that big a deal. If he is unwilling to fit into the structure then it's right that he should go. It is, after all, that structure which has turned the club around and got us back into the Championship. The next man will have to fit into the structure and, if he doesn't, he'll go too, but the club will keep on the same path. I have complete faith that this approach will, eventually, get us back into the Premier League.
But the fact that Neil was brought in is inherently part of the structure. The Head Coach is much more dispensable than a Manager. He was the right man at the right time but he didn't come in and change everything like a new manager would (if you see the distinction) and had to work with what was already there. The ship was already built, he just had to steer it.I have to disagree. The structure HELPED.
But it was AN's very pragmatic and experienced approach that got us up. We were sinking like a stone, he came in and made almost every player better, was very savvy with his selections and tactics, took the pressure off them in big games and made them very, very hard to beat. Noting to do with structure that I'd say, it was someone who knew what he was doing.
And I doubt we'll get better if he has to answer to a jargon spouting pretender. And even if we do, under this set up, if he does well, he'll be off too.
As long as the process is following mutually shared goals , leading towards a beneficial outcome............which we are all working towards......in .....etc etc....
Someone with a sexy as fûck foreign name
according to Alan Nixon he supposed to be in charge today but according to Nick Barnes and bbc radio Newcastle last night it gonna be Dodds and Proctor in charge the thought of them 2 in charge fills me with dreadIs Canning the understudy in charge today? 2 home games 6 points, excellent performances and you never know. Might want a crack at it himself.
But the fact that Neil was brought in is inherently part of the structure. The Head Coach is much more dispensable than a Manager. He was the right man at the right time but he didn't come in and change everything like a new manager would (if you see the distinction) and had to work with what was already there. The ship was already built, he just had to steer it.
according to Alan Nixon he supposed to be in charge today but according to Nick Barnes and bbc radio Newcastle last night it gonna be Dodds and Proctor in charge the thought of them 2 in charge fills me with dread
The structure isn't supposed to bend. The coach has to fit the structure. If he's not willing to work within it, he has to go. I'm glad the club aren't allowing themselves to be held to ransom by Neil, either financially or in the way that the club is run.Aye. But the much lauded structure couldn't bend enough to keep a coach of proven ability. And that is the glaring problem here, written in bold letters.
It looks to me as if the team is serving the needs of the structure, and not the structure serving the needs of the team.
It's the wrong way round, and the only one above it all is Speakman. He is a problem, and a big one.
Any coach coming in will get the same deal or similar, in other words the process is above the team. But the first team should count above everything, and count today.
An inflexible structure in any business will fail, and it's no different here.
I'd be happy with Dyche, I know he's not everyone's cup of tea but he's a quality manager. He did wonders at Burnley.
But I'm still holding out hope that AN will announce this morning that he has spoken to Stoke but decided to stay with us and has signed a 3 year deal.