Tbh I'm disappointed by this latest information. It basically means LUST have been BSing their way through the summer and as such are no better than bates.
Surely not.........
Worse than Bates is the phrase you are searching for.
Tbh I'm disappointed by this latest information. It basically means LUST have been BSing their way through the summer and as such are no better than bates.
Surely not.........
Worse than Bates is the phrase you are searching for.
Bates slags LUST off, therefore they were wrong all along.
Riiight.
erm, after months of people reading what wasn't said as what was said and giving pelters to anyone who actually could read ans so was challenginng the bollocks being spouted its a bit late to be saying dont read too much into a clear statement. Or are you ssaying GFH are lying about the fans in their statement. Isn't that just what cuddly Ken did?
I am trying not to feel smug but its hard not to.
Worse than the man who's raped our club for seven years?
Kindly, **** off to hell.
Its a joint statement you numpty cnut. Are you seriously going to suggest that DH and GFH have had a gun to their heads while it has been written and published.
The hole is deep enough, put the shovel down
Your emporer had no clothes. Go read the book.
Pretty much, yeah. It would be typical Bates if he threatened to prolong even further unless they made minor insulting gestures towards LUST, with one negligible inaccuracy reluctantly pointed our by Haigh, and no actual substance being contradicted in this non-statement.
So I'm still 100% behind Gary Cooper and the Leeds fans on this one.
Your point was nothing but lies and hyperbole.![]()

Pretty much, yeah. It would be typical Bates if he threatened to prolong even further unless they made minor insulting gestures towards LUST, with one negligible inaccuracy reluctantly pointed our by Haigh, and no actual substance being contradicted in this non-statement.
So I'm still 100% behind Gary Cooper and the Leeds fans on this one.
Your point was nothing but lies and hyperbole.![]()
Pretty much, yeah. It would be typical Bates if he threatened to prolong even further unless they made minor insulting gestures towards LUST, with one negligible inaccuracy reluctantly pointed our by Haigh, and no actual substance being contradicted in this non-statement.
So I'm still 100% behind Gary Cooper and the Leeds fans on this one.
. I know a lot of LUST fans that, following the statement, are now swaying the other way. Surely you must admit it will be somewhat damaging to their reputation though? 
I do admire the strength of your allegiance to LUST, and that's not sarcasm. I know a lot of LUST fans that, following the statement, are now swaying the other way. Surely you must admit it will be somewhat damaging to their reputation though?
Again, to clarify my stance on the matter, I am not against LUST - I believe that they are doing what they believe is the best for the club and they are Leeds fans and therefore want the best possible outcome for us - but I am not with them![]()
Their reputation is ****ed there is nothing they could say now to repair it.
I believed all along that they are doing what they believed was the best for the Gary Cooper and they are Gary Cooper fans and therefore wanted the best possible outcome for Gary Cooper.

I'll wait to see their reply before making assumptions, but I have to admit I don't think it looks great for them.
Honestly, I've never followed them enough to decide if they're doing the best for Gary Cooper or not. But they are all Leeds United fans and I do think they're trying to do what they believe is the best for us.
Chip van you're just another Cooper hater jumping on the statement to vent your demented insults at him and Lust. After reading your many ****e posts on this board i have come to the conclusion you're the only numpty cnut here![]()
Surely not.........
Worse than Bates is the phrase you are searching for.
They're not worse than bates though, are they? I don't know what you're problem with them is but it's one hell of a grudge. bates has done far worse. LUST don't lie to get people to buy season tickets then have a go at them for not showing up to matches.
As things stand they lied and got people to stay away and thus damaged the club, a club that will hopefully be here long after Bates, you and me will be long since dead. Why would they have done that? I know what it looks like.
and it's the only reason bates is selling, because running the club with such a boycott isn't doable with the amount of money he's sucking out and wasting on pointless things.
I agree with Marko. If LUST has been found to be lying about being in contact with GFH - and the relevant person should be able to provide proof on their conversation tomorrow in some sort of manner - they will be tarnished pretty badly.
It is one thing to be setting up as an organisation, having some values, doing all the right things, putting out information that they have confirmed, but it is another thing to be making it up.
Having said that, the LUST statement was pretty clear and contained a lot of substance. And if they did have information from within the GFH camp but their disclosure could well have led to a response from Bates that GFH has clearly breached the confidentiality agreement, then there are two aspects: 1) GFH are now trying to cover up their own mess, 2) LUST has placed GFH in a bad light with its pronouncement and that will only work out badly for LUST from both the current regime and the future one.
The one bit of substance that David Haigh could be bumbling is the timing of GFH's involvement. No doubt they have been involved at the beginning, but they may well have been in the position of brokers being paid by somone else to do the DD, whereas now they have stepped up. Smoke and mirrors methinks, but then again the whole lot has been s&m, so who knows what the real truth is.
LUST have some explaining to do. Luckily there is their AGM tomorrow, and maybe some forthright answers to straightforward questions will be asked. The content of those answers will be key to whether they are able to retain credibility or if they have just thrown it all away
