No way we will have to pay compo. He's no longer employed. All depends who else is after him and how much he wants
Hopefully… good riddancewell looks like KS is off
KS even said at the start of coming here we have 4 buckets of players as you've just described and wanted equal amounts in eachI like our recruitment policy but also agree we need to mix it with players who are contribute immediately. We need to balance the squad out better this summer but i still want a squad that is on the younger side
I normally find squads are made up of 4 type of players:
- ones just breaking into senior football (jobe rigg types)
- ones who have got good games under their belt but still quite a few yrs away from their peak (neil clarke ballard types)
- ones who are at their peak (o9 roberts)
- ones whose best days are behind them but bring valuable experience (dack evans types)
We have too many in that 1st pot, and in the last pot we dont have many (and the ones we have got havent contributed)
We need to balance those pots better
Hopefully… good riddance
I’m quite apprehensive if he goes. For me the DOF role has to be done by someone strong and arrogant enough to push their view down. There will be loads of dissenting voices underneath him but he’s got to push it down anyway.Harsh! He's made mistakes,but we're in a much more positive position now than when he arrived...lots of exciting young players on long term contracts,and as much as this season has been disappointing,last season was excellent.
From what we hear,it seems to be his disdainful personality, rather than his ability,which has contributed to the way he's regarded by some.
If he is away, it's how we replace him which is key....not easy.
I’m quite apprehensive if he goes. For me the DOF role has to be done by someone strong and arrogant enough to push their view down. There will be loads of dissenting voices underneath him but he’s got to push it down anyway.
It’s been said a million times before but we just need a bit of balance, if KS realises this I’ve no problems with him staying.
I think this is a good point. His role does require him to be very assertive. Without the weight of years of experience, or even a top level playing career, behind him, that probably does spill over into what comes across as arrogance. Arrogance is the trait in humans that I hate the most (which is why I react- or don't react- to some posters on here the way I do) but sometimes generally undesirable human traits can be useful in certain roles. Isn't it something like 98% of CEOs are clinical psychopaths? Very few of usI’m quite apprehensive if he goes. For me the DOF role has to be done by someone strong and arrogant enough to push their view down. There will be loads of dissenting voices underneath him but he’s got to push it down anyway.
It’s been said a million times before but we just need a bit of balance, if KS realises this I’ve no problems with him staying.
I do alsoI agree with this.
I think this is a good point. His role does require him to be very assertive. Without the weight of years of experience, or even a top level playing career, behind him, that probably does spill over into what comes across as arrogance. Arrogance is the trait in humans that I hate the most (which is why I react to some posters on here the way I do) but sometimes generally undesirable human traits can be useful in certain roles. Isn't it something like 98% of CEOs are clinical psychopaths? Very few of us, if any, have to be friends with Speakman, so what he's like as a person isn't at all relevant.
It's his stubbornness in not addressing the glaring issue of failing to bring in a DM and experienced striker and instead overloading us with no.10s who can also play wide. Oh and bringing in Hjelde for a fee. He had a few good windows in getting us out of league one, the rest has been more miss than hit, seems like he tries to be too clever for his own good at times, imo of course.Harsh! He's made mistakes,but we're in a much more positive position now than when he arrived...lots of exciting young players on long term contracts,and as much as this season has been disappointing,last season was excellent.
From what we hear,it seems to be his disdainful personality, rather than his ability,which has contributed to the way he's regarded by some.
If he is away, it's how we replace him which is key....not easy.
It's his stubbornness in not addressing the glaring issue of failing to bring in a DM and experienced striker and instead overloading us with no.10s who can also play wide. Oh and bringing in Hjelde for a fee. He had a few good windows in getting us out of league one, the rest has been more miss than hit, seems like he tries to be too clever for his own good at times, imo of course.
Probably the biggest endorsement.https://x.com/reimsvdt/status/1786259932305608976?s=46&t=XIg9Hh834PQk5XsiYvDETw
A glowing reference for Still here from Reim’s main fanzine:
“THANK YOU Will Still
Players come and go, coaches come and go, managers change, but we, the supporters, remain faithful, unshakeable at the Stade de Reims.
And you will definitely have a special place in our hearts. You knew how to carve your name into the history of the club with a passion and dedication that few have been able to match.
You infused this game with a soul that touched us all: by your thirst for spectacle, by the way in which you knew how to give us emotions, and above all, by your incredible ability to make us dream together, to aspire to summits. always higher, to the point of dreaming of Europe.
Delaune, once so silent, now resonates with the echoes of your greatness and your philosophy.
Your absence will leave a huge void, but your legacy is immortal.
You knew how to make us evolve and appreciate the matches to win them and not to not lose them.
We will always carry you in our hearts... we will miss you... and the rhubarb yogurt section will feel like an orphan!”
I think you have to question how much of that stubbornness is real, and how much is perception. Nick Barnes was claiming yesterday that deals to bring in a proven 9 were a long way to be completed in Jan, but we fell at the last. Just because those players haven't materialised, I'm not sure we can say that the club, or Speakman, don't recognise where the holes in the squad are.It's his stubbornness in not addressing the glaring issue of failing to bring in a DM and experienced striker and instead overloading us with no.10s who can also play wide. Oh and bringing in Hjelde for a fee. He had a few good windows in getting us out of league one, the rest has been more miss than hit, seems like he tries to be too clever for his own good at times, imo of course.
I think you have to question how much of that stubbornness is real, and how much is perception. Nick Barnes was claiming yesterday that deals to bring in a proven 9 were a long way to be completed in Jan, but we fell at the last. Just because those players haven't materialised, I'm not sure we can say that the club, or Speakman, don't recognise where the holes in the squad are.
Pretty sure they knew the weaknesses whatever spin they put on it because they use data and it’s obvious. Has to be said though for a club not cash rich not recruiting well, wasting resource and not having playing success change will happen. I’d have kept him for the good work he’s done elsewhere just altered the recruitment but that’s effectively a demotion and he won’t accept that I wouldn’t imagineI think you have to question how much of that stubbornness is real, and how much is perception. Nick Barnes was claiming yesterday that deals to bring in a proven 9 were a long way to be completed in Jan, but we fell at the last. Just because those players haven't materialised, I'm not sure we can say that the club, or Speakman, don't recognise where the holes in the squad are.
If Barnes is right about those centre forwards, and they chose somewhere else at the last minute, how much of that is Speakman's fault? There are clearly factors beyond what Speakman is doing that has caused them to choose somewhere else. I'm not claiming he's wonderful, and you may be right that some adjustment to things would be the right thing to do, I just think a lot of the criticism of him lacks critical thought.Pretty sure they knew the weaknesses whatever spin they put on it because they use data and it’s obvious. Has to be said though for a club not cash rich not recruiting well, wasting resource and not having playing success change will happen. I’d have kept him for the good work he’s done elsewhere just altered the recruitment but that’s effectively a demotion and he won’t accept that I wouldn’t imagine
Havnt materialised for 2 years ? 4 windows?
Pretty sure they knew the weaknesses whatever spin they put on it because they use data and it’s obvious. Has to be said though for a club not cash rich not recruiting well, wasting resource and not having playing success change will happen. I’d have kept him for the good work he’s done elsewhere just altered the recruitment but that’s effectively a demotion and he won’t accept that I wouldn’t imagine
He could have identified any number of players to fill those roles, but factors beyond anyone's control could have prevented them from coming.The players will have materialised,no doubt,but the financial and contractual parameters will have been outside the remit.