P
Prehab26
Guest
The greedy ginger melt
I don't share that view but I know some do.
The greedy ginger melt
Maybe these two are the contingency planSo we put all our eggs into the Still basket. That was their first mistake. Should always have contingency plans?
It would appear that we do if two candidates have attended second interviews this week.So we put all our eggs into the Still basket. That was their first mistake. Should always have contingency plans?
I know I was only joshingI don't share that view but I know some do.
God, everything has to be so negative about the club doesn’t it?So we put all our eggs into the Still basket. That was their first mistake. Should always have contingency plans?
I’ll assume that still was the number one and possibly only choice then when he did a U-turn we’ve had to start again?
That’s just conjecture. It seems nobody gives the club any credit preferring just to believe every negative baseless rumour.Maybe they are the contingency plan or maybe they weren't and Still was the only choice and had to start again like you suggested?
Who said they put all there eggs there? It was said he was no. 1 choice, and that almost worked out. So just maybe they’ve moved on to back up plans not actually starting from scratch again.So we put all our eggs into the Still basket. That was their first mistake. Should always have contingency plans?
Right, so we're just pandering to anyone who shouts loud enough that they've got info about the club, are we? I'll remember to toe the line in future.
You got itRight, so we're just pandering to anyone who shouts loud enough that they've got info about the club, are we? I'll remember to toe the line in future.
I'm not slagging the club off at all by saying IF they put all their eggs in one basket it was a mistake by them.
Maybe they are the contingency plan or maybe they weren't and Still was the only choice and had to start again like you suggested?
You didn’t say “IF” in your original post thoughI'm not slagging the club off at all by saying IF they put all their eggs in one basket it was a mistake by them.
And I'm quite happy with most of the people linked with the job including Rosenior.
Cifuentes is who I'm hoping for now.
This post has probably been written ( or similar) a dozen times, it makes no difference I think they are pulling their pud as they write the s hite.Really gets me that there are a load of good posters on here who may have different opinions or viewpoints and at times it can get a bit angry or bitchy but in general it stays reasonably civilised.
Then you get the odd cock womble who to be fair are normally the most negative of posters and only really post when things are a bit troubled or are not going well, they then start with the digs and jibes at the club then move on to any poster they think will rise up to the bait. Wish they would just piss off with there ill informed or thought out comments and take their crusty old **** splattered stiff sports sock with them and concentrate on getting both feet into their school shoes.
Rant owa !!
Nothing so far mate...although it appears as though something may be imminent. There is, however,a debate about whether imminently means imminent or not,and whether either word means very soon,which I would advise you to steer clear of.![]()
![]()



It's a funny thing this recruitment process.
The club can absolutely shank it and go through their first few choices, embarrassing themselves along the way.
They can drop down to eighth or ninth choice, refused by everyone, and if that man succeeds... no one gives a flying ****.
Because there are several right men out there for the job at any one time. As long as the man is in before recruitment starts in earnest/the preseason, and he turns out to be a good choice, it's a job well done.
Ugly and frustration though it may seem.

'So we put all our eggs into the Still basket. That was their first mistake.'
I don't know if you realise what you inevitably do or not ...
... so I'll explain.
(You're not alone and I'm speaking generally not personally ... there's a regular theme on here, but mainly on RTG.)
What you'll do is make a bold statement as fact.
If no one challenges it, or someone agrees, you'll come back with something a bit stronger to back it up.
If you are challenged you'll back track a little then, later, act the victim and say 'I am entitled to my opinion'.
Then you complain that people think you're negative, I don't understand why tbh ... no offence.
So that's what I think, perhaps you could tell me where I'm wrong or maybe you don't care.
This post has probably been written ( or similar) a dozen times, it makes no difference I think they are pulling their pud as they write the s hite.