ive given up hoping for better, Adkins wouldn't be my first choice. I think its his constant positivety that got to me when he was at scunny.......which actually might be what we need
I've seen a lot of criticism of Darnborough on Twitter, but I wonder just how accountable he is for this mess, we all seem to be in broad agreement that Sluts has been dealt a **** hand but if as head of recruitment he's been given not a great deal to spend and needing to get in 3/4 of a squad, assuming the Chelsea loanees weren't optional, to get in Stewart, Kingsley, Toral, Dicko, Irvine, Mazuch, Larsson and FC for about 15 mil isn't that bad is it???
Who did we spend 2m on? Mazuch was 800k wasnt he?I don’t know if this has been posted before but why did we pay £2 million for a centre back and then play loan players before him? It makes no sense to me, unless he is worse than said loans. Have we only found out that he is not as good as we thought, after he apparently played well in pre season? I know that is different to the real thing but is a reasonable guide to how the player will perform. If that is the case what the ****ing hell did we buy him for?
ive given up hoping for better, Adkins wouldn't be my first choice. I think its his constant positivety that got to me when he was at scunny.......which actually might be what we need
Who did we spend 2m on? Mazuch was 800k wasnt he?
I've seen a lot of criticism of Darnborough on Twitter, but I wonder just how accountable he is for this mess, we all seem to be in broad agreement that Sluts has been dealt a **** hand but if as head of recruitment he's been given not a great deal to spend and needing to get in 3/4 of a squad, assuming the Chelsea loanees weren't optional, to get in Stewart, Kingsley, Toral, Dicko, Irvine, Mazuch, Larsson and FC for about 15 mil isn't that bad is it???
Whatever. He is our player is the point I was trying to make. Also if the loan players are better it doesn't say a lot for him.
I don’t know if this has been posted before but why did we pay £2 million for a centre back and then play loan players before him? It makes no sense to me, unless he is worse than said loans. Have we only found out that he is not as good as we thought, after he apparently played well in pre season? I know that is different to the real thing but is a reasonable guide to how the player will perform. If that is the case what the ****ing hell did we buy him for?
They may well have clauses in the loan contracts that stipulate if they are fit they'll play/start a game.
Hector is a mind boggler for me though. Why would a 25 year old professional play in the reserves and go out on loan rather than find a club that fits? If I was Darnbourgh I wouldn't have touched him with a barge-pole. We've let better players than him go at 20 to go and find first team football.
I'd struggle to name 5 players from most premier league clubs never mind the ****e that is in this division.
What does that say?
About me?
About them?
Answers on a postcard to Ehab Allam c/o Hull City Tigers, The Circle, Ull
You must log in or register to see media
I know somebody mentioned he was at Bristol last night, this is just confirming it.
If its' in their contract to play .. and they are playing like twats.. drop them and see if the owning club take them back .. I'm willing to bet they won' the way some of them have performed this season
I'm sure streams will be available even if Leo will be replaced. No worries.
But i still hope he has some more time to learn something new and show his true skill, i think his ability is hidden for now.
Today i've seen some amazing attacks and combination movements i loved a lot, but no goals in right moments sadly.