It looks like it lost power, sent a mayday message which enabled them to stop traffic, slung out its anchor but drifted into the bridge.
Even a system failure there will still be a maritime inquisition and why there is a systems failure.. Whoever the Insurers they will want to know too. There is a good chance the Captt and Chief engineer will be under arrest, or at least that's what they did back in my day almost 20 years ago but things may have moved on by now. Most is usually down to human error somewhere down the line or will be seen that way even if a systems failure why weren't,t contingency plans made that kind of thing.Usually in that case no one is brought to bear only if negligence is the cause.


A new low even for BartonYou must log in or register to see media
You must log in or register to see media
A bit longer time lapse video here. Looks like multiple power failures then too late to change course. ...
You must log in or register to see media
A bit longer time lapse video here. Looks like multiple power failures then too late to change course. ...
You must log in or register to see media
It'll obviously have been a canny old whack, but it's insane how easily that bridge just seems to collapse.
There will definately be a pilot on board for a ship of that size but is only there to give advice to the Captain so the buck stops with the Captain especially if it is a fault with the ship. Sometimes the Chief Engineer too, if one of the many systems fails. I would imagine it will take a long blame game for ths to get resolved. A lot of ships these days are under manned and maintenance cost are huge and its usually a maintenance issue somewhere down the line for a system failure or the equiment becomes old and is not replaced.If that ship had a pilot on board then I wouldn't like to be in his shoes, bridge collapsed like a deck of cards, little chance of finding survivors in cold water like that.
Billions of dollars to sort this one out.
There will definately be a pilot on board for a ship of that size but is only there to give advice to the Captain so the buck stops with the Captain especially if it is a fault with the ship. Sometimes the Chief Engineer too, if one of the many systems fails. I would imagine it will take a long blame game for ths to get resolved. A lot of ships these days are under manned and maintenance cost are huge and its usually a maintenance issue somewhere down the line for a system failure or the equiment becomes old and is not replaced.
I am not sure When the bridge was built but if old then probably built before the huge container ships that now run under the bridge. I heard today that modern bridges have concrete structures built around the legs to protect them. If not then in the likelihood of a collision of this magnitude then total catastrophic failure of the bridge is likely. In my view if they increased the size of the ships, even with dynamic positioning systems and 100% redundancy, then an accident was waiting to happen .I beleive this is not the first time this has hapenned around the world. There have been quite a few major disasters in history and probably will be again I am afraid.
If you look at the traffic on the bridge you can clearly see that they stop traffic going over before the ship hits it. Flashing lights on the bridge suggests that they knew what was happening as they are the lights of emergency services stopped on the bridge
I Agree Smug. Whe I first worked on ships in1971 they generally had a crew of 40 when I left 35 years later we had a crew of 11 to 15 dependingQuite right, you'll never stop planes crashing or boats going adrift.
What worries me is the increasing reliance on computer technology. It's only last week they were showing remotely controlled crewless ships.
When car thieves can 'grab' the signal from your remote control, then drive it away, it worries me what terrorists could do with air traffic control systems, shipping and even traffic lights. We know China and Russia have hackers attacking Western banks and other establishments, what next?
You must log in or register to see media
Mr "I'm not sexist but..." at it again.
He really is a lowlife piece of **** isn't he
I Agree Smug. Whe I first worked on ships in1971 they generally had a crew of 40 when I left 35 years later we had a crew of 11 to 15 depending
on what we were doing. I was a trained Engineer and at the beginning we had electricians and all kinds of skilled men sadly towards they end everything became totally automated the whole dynamic positioning system was run by 3 computers so if one became suspect with perhapsa faulty input signal the other 2 would vote that computer out. Unfortunately if you get contaminated fuel all the computers in the world won,t help. Technology is all very good until something very basic goes wrong.
Yeah I will take a look, I have been looking for something to watch of late. Cheers!If you haven't already seen it, watch a film called "Leave the world behind",mate.
My wife stopped my physical response to people 25+ years ago. Long story but is was her or my behaviour. Just checked and she says I have a pass on him if ever the opportunity presents itselfYou must log in or register to see media

My wife stopped my physical response to people 25+ years ago. Long story but is was her or my behaviour. Just checked and she says I have a pass on him if ever the opportunity presents itself![]()
My wife stopped my physical response to people 25+ years ago. Long story but is was her or my behaviour. Just checked and she says I have a pass on him if ever the opportunity presents itself![]()