Mafia 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not really...now Valley looks twice as suspicious <laugh> Still only two in the running as of yet....and Sky still not safe <whistle>

I think there's a poster who has posted somewhere on the past 3 pages who is trying to pull the wool over everyone's eyes. That's why I changed. My gut is telling me I'm right. It will be interesting if said poster will change vote just before 8 tonight.
 
Mummy:7282376 said:
Sorry for not replying lads. Just got in from work. Changed vote just to see what would happen. Wasn't forced into changing vote either.
Gerrez is still a **** so I change my vote back to Gerrez now.

Edit, I'm still watching the poster that's got my gut instinct telling me he's a naughty boy.



Thank you.


OK... then... yes... Pressure off Valley- and means IBWT could be telling truth too... so back to the drawing board.

Wasn't the pressure only on me because of Valley's change? Thanks anyway like...
 
A note of caution:

Just because Milk uses fancy colours, makes long detailed posts and has played the game before does not mean people should follow him blindly...

I 100% agree with this! You should question everything I say. I make mistakes and a variety of opinions and a variety of people coming up with potential theories is best for town.
 
I say we make a decision on 3 posters and give them 3 votes each. Because that means Sky will not be in danger (2 votes off lynching/coin toss. 1 vote leaves him open to late vote switch)

forming a pact....is that why u voted for me ?
 
Nozzer:7282400 said:
More fancy colours... in light of Valley's admission he is not coerced.


Recap of my thoughts:


afcftw No Evidence against AFC. Was "potentially saved" by Valley. Been quieter than normal though- which is worth investigator investigating. Not been online so OK. On the Potential Heavy - long short list.
Bodanki' No Evidence against. On potential Heavy - long short list
Gerrez No Evidence against. Was "potentially saved" by Valley. On potential Heavy - long short list
Lucaaas No Evidence against. On potential Heavy - long short list
MITO No Evidence against. On potential Heavy - long short list.
Nozzer No Evidence against. On potential Heavy - long short list
RHC No Evidence against. On potential Heavy - long short list
Swarbs No Evidence against. Been fairly quiet On potential Heavy - long short list
Billy No Evidence against. On potential Heavy - long short list

brb No Evidence against
danilo. See above- very quiet- worth investigator investigating at night


InBiscanWeTrust Suspicious first vote. Either under influence of heavy or wants us to think that. I don't want to remove tonight- I want to wait until tomorrow to see what it tells us.
Valley. Looked suspicious for a while... might still be. Took a long time to say not being coerced. His change of vote and not explaining it for a while is still odd.

Mummy - Me. I know that I'm innocent.
Skylarker* - Astro has told us he is innocent. Of course, there could be a twist.

Not as pretty as previously. You're now less certain to be innocent in my eyes.

Notice I was guilty by association to Valley yet despite Valley no longer being as guilty as before and him now voting for me, my guilt remains :)
 
Voting Table: (Order vertically is from first person voted to most recent person voted for, Order of votes by is first cast listed first, second listed second etc)
[table="width: 500, class: grid, align: left"]
[tr]
[td]Nominee[/td]
[td]Votes[/td]
[td]Vote(s) By[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Gerrez[/td]
[td]2[/td]
[td]AfcFtw, valley[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Lucaaas[/td]
[td]1[/td]
[td]Mito[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]BRB[/td]
[td]2[/td]
[td]gerrez, lucaaas[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]IBWT[/td]
[td]2[/td]
[td]nozzer, billy[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]RHC[/td]
[td]1[/td]
[td]bodanki[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]sky[/td]
[td]1[/td]
[td]IBWT[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]afcftw[/td]
[td]2[/td]
[td]swarbs,brb[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]bodanki[/td]
[td]1[/td]
[td]RHC[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]valley[/td]
[td]1[/td]
[td]mummy[/td]
[/tr]


[/table]

not voted listed alphabetically: Danilo, Lucaaas, Skylarker

Table of people with no votes: (listed alphabetically)
[table="width: 500, class: grid, align: left"]
[tr]
[td]Nominee[/td]
[td]Votes[/td]
[td]Vote(s) By[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Billy[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Danilo[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]
mummy's milk[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]MITO[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Nozzer[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Swarbs[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Valleygraduate12[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]No lynch[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.