Luis Suarez appreciation thread

Nah mate, no training, not even allowed in a stadium
#definitelyexcessive

Taking illegal substances to improve performance means you cheat and break rules in every game you play while you are doing it, both international and domestic. That's why it is such a heavy ban for that, and a full ban.

 

Is this another way of reopening the closed Suarez thread..?

 

.

 

The thought had crossed my mind lol

 

Lol, no, it was his comments

Worthy of discussion, if it gets out of hand (cant see it doing though) then lockdown mothertrucker!

 

This. Hard to argue he doesn't deserve it, but FIFA had to re-write there rule book and give an unprecedented ban, especially the domestic one, based on populist purposes as much as anything else. That said, FIFA can do that - like the FA it is a law onto itself, and the only way either can be challenged is through CAS, and Liverpool have been very scared and cowardly to do that in the past, even when statutes and procedures favoured them. In this case there is surely bugger-all for Liverpool to gain in sabre-rattling when FIFA know they won't do a fig. Should be interesting to see if Liverpool have redress against the Uruguayan FA though, even if they have to sell at cut price.

Otherwise, it's a fair penalty but arrived at out of an on the hoof policy and procedures that sum up FIFA aptly. Be interesting to see what the appeal brings forth.

 

I agree. It's not that his ban is too harsh, it's that those other offences are treated too leniently.

 

lol @ that beak and roid headed cheating fat mess Maradona coming out in support, that's like Gary Glitter gving a character reference for Savile.

 

Can't agree folks, for various reasons, a full ban is given for very valid reasons when it is doping. because the offence takes place in both international and domestic.

Even if they up the ban for elbowing, they won't ban for it domestically.

Also, they should not be making new rules when incidences occur, then how is that fair, to have a new punishment created for your crime.

imagine you ran a red light and they said, we're gonna change it so you can get 4 years, if you knew it was 4 years would you have ran the red light in the first place.

punishments are meant to be a deterrent after all. So they just change the punishment. Biting IS covered under the rules, violent conduct. Any suggestion it is not is bollocks..

 

I actually make you right there.

I never thought he'd get a total football ban, as there was no precedent for it and it looked to be stretching the current rule book to administer one.

I think given his previous it's probably the right result, but I also think your point about a known deterent is a fair one.......but then again if he was acting due to a compulsive disorder, then no level of deterrent would make any difference eh mate

 

With drugs you also don't know when or how long he was doing it before the test found it out.

 

Hardly... Let's not silly football issue with two vile child abusers

 

FFS

Lighten up mate, it's called a joke.

 

Rio was caught bang to rights with a white powderpuff nose on the day he lost his memory.

 

Abusing children is a joke?

 

We don't know how long EvilSuarez has been going round biting innocent strangers under cover of night.

 

Put your rod away you silly little man.

 

Maradona is a legend

Even he appreciates Suarez' genius.

 

My opinion has changed. Suarez Out!

 

I believe you are on the wrong board. This board (http://www.not606.com/forumdisplay.php/23-Manchester-United) is more suitable for opinions like that

EDIT: Either that or the mythical Everton board which I'm not sure actually exists.