You must log in or register to see images
I’m all for sticking with principles… But this is utterly ridiculous. Most of the people involved in the Sun with hillsborough are probably dead or working somewhere else now
OR,
This just MIGHT be a good excuse not to hold an England Game and have the approval of their Fans at the same time.
As I recall, the last England (mens) game held at The SoL was against Australia.
The FA picked up the profits from the Bars, Gate, Sponsorship, TV, in fact everything they could.
SAFC did complain that it cost THEM to hold that Game.
I suspect though, that if another Full International was offered to them they would risk anoying a lot of local Fans if they turned it down.
Just because people have moved on, it doesn't mean the Sun isn't a scummy paper anymore. It's in their DNA.I’m all for sticking with principles… But this is utterly ridiculous. Most of the people involved in the Sun with hillsborough are probably dead or working somewhere else now
Just because people have moved on, it doesn't mean the Sun isn't a scummy paper anymore. It's in their DNA.
Well saidThe FA, I assume, have to be seen to fair with all of the major media.
If they were to ban The Sun for political reasons there'd be people wanting The Telegraph banned for taking Russian money to distribute their propaganda.
Over many years the media has rightly been investigated, fined and faced criminal charges, that's something that should and will continue ...
... but this country has a proud history of allowing a free press to investigate the government, the police, the judiciary, etc.
The media should be held to account at times but I don't agree with it being restricted. Many newspapers shamefully misrepresented the events during the pit closures, etc. I choose not to buy them, simple enough. Without this statement, from LFC, no one would know which papers were at the game and no one is forced to buy any of them anyway.
LFC has become a cause that people aren't allowed to criticise.
Good for them. There are more places should do this and to more papers. The Mail would be on my list.You must log in or register to see images
The FA, I assume, have to be seen to fair with all of the major media.
If they were to ban The Sun for political reasons there'd be people wanting The Telegraph banned for taking Russian money to distribute their propaganda.
Over many years the media has rightly been investigated, fined and faced criminal charges, that's something that should and will continue ...
... but this country has a proud history of allowing a free press to investigate the government, the police, the judiciary, etc.
The media should be held to account at times but I don't agree with it being restricted. Many newspapers shamefully misrepresented the events during the pit closures, etc. I choose not to buy them, simple enough. Without this statement, from LFC, no one would know which papers were at the game and no one is forced to buy any of them anyway.
LFC has become a cause that people aren't allowed to criticise.
Good for them. There are more places should do this and to more papers. The Mail would be on my list.
Hateful lies have no placeThis is very much a one-off gesture and relates entirely to the City of Liverpool.
But the idea of banning any National Publication, just because you don't agree with what they stand for, goes against every free principlal that our Country stands for.
The quotation, often attributed to Voltaire, ----
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
Covers it for me.
And in passing I would mention that I often learn more from those that I disagree with than from those who agree with me.
Don’t understand why the hell England would want to play there anyway? Their fans don’t consider themselves “English” and boo the National Anthem.