Legal Help?

Not at all , my original posts makes it all clear

#bindippertobes


Now IF the company does take you to court, who's side will the judge side with, IF you fail to respond to the alleged debtor?

see my previous posts on what to do.

Now at the end of the day I dont give a crap what the OP does, its not my problem

 

What original post is that from? Post the link to it

As it is you’re wrong again, as the whether you’d previously appealed a spurious charge would be irrelevant in court if the charge was not legally enforceable.

You clueless twat.

 

Doesn't make a difference. Courts deal with facts, you should know this living the big hard gangster lifestyle. You could just say you've never received them, they don't send them recorded delivery and if they do don't accept it. You aren't obliged by law to reply to them.

 

Asking people on a forum you're pretty much asking to get ****ed over tbh, I wonder if the people giving it would be so quick to throw it in the bin. Links to websites with trusted advice have been provided. If they decide to take you to court, although there's an outside chance of that, and you've done nothing, you will probably be ****ed. Regardless what the amatuer lawyers on here say, you are legally in breach of contract, a contract which you agreed upon when parking your car.
They probably won't, but you just don't know, the person whom decides may be in a real ****-off mood when he picks up your file and decide to **** you over just to make themselves feel better.

 

Absolutely

 

Then you are foolish, plenty of people have been taken to court and lost doing exactly what you have advised doing, because contract law is on their side. If the terms of the contract are clearly displayed on entering the car park, and you park, then you have accepted those terms and are subject to them. Breaking those terms means you are legally in breach of contract. Your mate down the pub may say somethng different, but the law books don't.

 

I don't drink fella, pubs aren't my thing.

 

ok, the local crack house then.

 

It gives you a broad spectrum to mull over and can be useful. I've done my own research and thinking as well, I'm no mug.

 

Do we really need to go down this road again

 

I did mean to put a wink emote in, but it was too much effort.

 

Fair play x

 

but they do send them by recorded ( when its court time)

Listen to big ern, he is saying what I have said not to ignore it.

 

like many have said the letter is nothing 2 do with law.....

tell me gonzo does the letter come from a company or a person>>>by that I mean by name and signature...........its always a big give away>>>>only man can take on man in court(woman if that's the case).....but no company can speak or sign letters>>>>so there`s the grey area straight up>>>and the company would know it......its the get out of jail card for them if you know the laws>>>>>>see my previous post on fines and forfeitures and Halsburys law on the courts of administration.

yes most of Britain is afraid of bailiffs and the justice system(the big bad wolfs)>>>>>>part of the reason I feel law should be taught in schools rather than crap like religious education...........so yeah we know more about the rights of people who believe in a man who lives in the clouds than we know about our own right as a free man of the land..........shameful hey

 

It's from a company. I'll wait for the next letter and update this thread then.

 

dude...honestly don't be scared into paying like big ern suggests(no offence ern)>>>>>>>>are you still local 2 me>>>>>if so I will arrange 2 meet and I shall pass you a letter that you just sign and send off>>>>>>>>you wont get another letter from claimant I can assure you

please log in to view this image

 

Tell them you work there?

 

show me where I have ONCE said he should pay it, I have said the opposite, I said fight it via Lidl's self interest, ignoring it is stupid and you don;t have a clue about what you are talking about, don't usually take people to court is not the same as can't.
If you accept a contract, in this case parking in a privately owned car park with signs stating what the contract is (if they are not clearly visible on entry that is one way to get out of it), then you have accepted a contract, it's legally binding, everyone who actually KNOWS what they are talking about, rather than people who get their information from David Icke et al, will say the same.
The letter is nothing to do with the law, but the acceptance of the contract IS. If they have proof, which they undoubtably have, then ignoring it is stupid.