If only I could read about a sparrow being turned into a monster who gets killed by a boy on a broom stick several thousand pages later.
You have a fine imagination ... you should write it ... I'm not aware of that story having been done

If only I could read about a sparrow being turned into a monster who gets killed by a boy on a broom stick several thousand pages later.

I believe saffy answered youDeclan Rice is ****ed then ....
... but seriously for a moment Saffy ... and I have absolutely no sympathy for her plight, despite what the 'one cells' seem to think, why is nobody in authority quoting what they can actually charge her with should she return? ... or have I missed it?

I believe saffy answered you
You have a fine imagination ... you should write it ... I'm not aware of that story having been done![]()
Nobody has any issue with her being charged with an offence and being convicted on the evidence which seems to be substantial at first glance. The issue is whether the Government should have the power to take action against her outside the normal legal process. In the circumstance described above @brb wouldn't have his citizenship removed he would be tried and imprisoned if convicted.If your Mrs told you she was off out cutting people’s heads off and you were to stay in doors and make sure she had a nice steak pie to come home to, are you suggesting that you wouldn’t be considered as an accessory to murder?
Change murder to terrorism and you’ve got your answer.
Nobody has any issue with her being charged with an offence and being convicted on the evidence which seems to be substantial at first glance. The issue is whether the Government should have the power to take action against her outside the normal legal process. In the circumstance described above @brb wouldn't have his citizenship removed he would be tried and imprisoned if convicted.

No he didn't Bobster - he cited treason - it is not treason to travel overseas - it is not even treason per se to join an illegal organisation (might be prosecutable under other laws) - to be able to prove treason you would either have to prove that she gave away sovereign intelligence (like a spy) or that her actions in some way constituted a direct threat to the UK ... not sure that shagging a jihadi counts ... you got anything else?
I would but you’d probably be on here boring everybody about it as soon as you’d read it.

Minutes then ...try harder mate ... you have the music in you![]()
Only if it's actually legal. If not it is a major cock up and will benefit her.Well stripping her of her citizenship is a Brucey Bonus then innit? Great.![]()
She would have to prove that she didn’t, under interrogation.
She can be arrested on suspicion, and charged if she gives away enough. The problem is she’d have some ‘no comment’ suit sat next to her so there you go, better she’s left in the desert for the vultures to pick at.
Only if it's actually legal. If not it is a major cock up and will benefit her.
Why even ponder this though? Sajid Javid probably hasn’t just thought it’d be funny to do and not considered it’s legality.
Doesn't work like that under terrorism laws.
The right of no comment is not an option.
The issue here though is she hasn't committed a crime as things stand.
I didn’t literally mean ‘no comment’, but she’d have said suit protecting her ‘rights’ and she’d more than likely give far less away and possibly/probably avoid prosecution. She’s as thick as pig ****, get her in a room without a brief and I would be confident she’d be doing a 20 year stretch.
You have no idea what she’s done.
I think it’s inevitable that she will end up back in the UK.
That's the issue mate. No one knows what she's done. But going to be an isis bride is not a crime currently.
And as I said above the terror laws as they stand mean anyone coming back can be questioned, 8 hours i believe, and can't ask for a solicitor or use no comment