leave her there

You have a fine imagination ... you should write it ... I'm not aware of that story having been done

 

I believe saffy answered you

 

You're all going to get spammed to **** with Express, Mail and twitter links!

 

No he didn't Bobster - he cited treason - it is not treason to travel overseas - it is not even treason per se to join an illegal organisation (might be prosecutable under other laws) - to be able to prove treason you would either have to prove that she gave away sovereign intelligence (like a spy) or that her actions in some way constituted a direct threat to the UK ... not sure that shagging a jihadi counts ... you got anything else?

 

I would but you’d probably be on here boring everybody about it as soon as you’d read it.

 

Nobody has any issue with her being charged with an offence and being convicted on the evidence which seems to be substantial at first glance. The issue is whether the Government should have the power to take action against her outside the normal legal process. In the circumstance described above @brb wouldn't have his citizenship removed he would be tried and imprisoned if convicted.

 

Well stripping her of her citizenship is a Brucey Bonus then innit? Great.

 

She would have to prove that she didn’t, under interrogation.

She can be arrested on suspicion, and charged if she gives away enough. The problem is she’d have some ‘no comment’ suit sat next to her so there you go, better she’s left in the desert for the vultures to pick at.

 

Minutes then ...try harder mate ... you have the music in you

 

Mate no matter how much more you read, your reading jokes won’t move me. It’s like me trying to wind you up cos you know nothing about being a mechanical engineer for example, you literally don’t care (I assume).

 

Only if it's actually legal. If not it is a major cock up and will benefit her.

 

Doesn't work like that under terrorism laws.

The right of no comment is not an option.

The issue here though is she hasn't committed a crime as things stand.

 

Why even ponder this though? Sajid Javid probably hasn’t just thought it’d be funny to do and not considered it’s legality.

 

FYI when returning to this country, even off holiday from Spain, if there is any terror related suspicion you can be stopped and questioned for a few hours, and you have no right even to ask for a solicitor.

 

Apparently there are 3 options or choices here for shamima and all work against Sajid potentially

The worst being she comes back in 2 years

Can't say I know the details. Some bod was telling Kay burley

 

I didn’t literally mean ‘no comment’, but she’d have said suit protecting her ‘rights’ and she’d more than likely give far less away and possibly/probably avoid prosecution. She’s as thick as pig ****, get her in a room without a brief and I would be confident she’d be doing a 20 year stretch.

You have no idea what she’s done.

 

I think it’s inevitable that she will end up back in the UK.

 

That's the issue mate. No one knows what she's done. But going to be an isis bride is not a crime currently.

And as I said above the terror laws as they stand mean anyone coming back can be questioned, 8 hours i believe, and can't ask for a solicitor or use no comment

 

Current law would indicate so

 

Well she best hope she doesn’t come back then cos she’s an absolute pig of a person, even if she’s innocent she’ll **** up.

Although she isn’t innocent, she is a terrorist.