leave her there

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

What should we do with her

  • Let the slag rot where she is?

    Votes: 25 62.5%
  • Bring her back home and lock her up

    Votes: 6 15.0%
  • Bring her back and interrogate her for info for her freedom

    Votes: 2 5.0%
  • Bring her back and give love and understanding

    Votes: 4 10.0%
  • Just give the bitch and her spawn everything she wants for free

    Votes: 2 5.0%
  • Give her the bullet

    Votes: 7 17.5%

  • Total voters
    40
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Declan Rice is ****ed then ....

... but seriously for a moment Saffy ... and I have absolutely no sympathy for her plight, despite what the 'one cells' seem to think, why is nobody in authority quoting what they can actually charge her with should she return? ... or have I missed it?
I believe saffy answered you
 
I believe saffy answered you

No he didn't Bobster - he cited treason - it is not treason to travel overseas - it is not even treason per se to join an illegal organisation (might be prosecutable under other laws) - to be able to prove treason you would either have to prove that she gave away sovereign intelligence (like a spy) or that her actions in some way constituted a direct threat to the UK ... not sure that shagging a jihadi counts ... you got anything else?
 
If your Mrs told you she was off out cutting people’s heads off and you were to stay in doors and make sure she had a nice steak pie to come home to, are you suggesting that you wouldn’t be considered as an accessory to murder?

Change murder to terrorism and you’ve got your answer.
Nobody has any issue with her being charged with an offence and being convicted on the evidence which seems to be substantial at first glance. The issue is whether the Government should have the power to take action against her outside the normal legal process. In the circumstance described above @brb wouldn't have his citizenship removed he would be tried and imprisoned if convicted.
 
Nobody has any issue with her being charged with an offence and being convicted on the evidence which seems to be substantial at first glance. The issue is whether the Government should have the power to take action against her outside the normal legal process. In the circumstance described above @brb wouldn't have his citizenship removed he would be tried and imprisoned if convicted.

Well stripping her of her citizenship is a Brucey Bonus then innit? Great. <ok>
 
No he didn't Bobster - he cited treason - it is not treason to travel overseas - it is not even treason per se to join an illegal organisation (might be prosecutable under other laws) - to be able to prove treason you would either have to prove that she gave away sovereign intelligence (like a spy) or that her actions in some way constituted a direct threat to the UK ... not sure that shagging a jihadi counts ... you got anything else?

She would have to prove that she didn’t, under interrogation. <ok>

She can be arrested on suspicion, and charged if she gives away enough. The problem is she’d have some ‘no comment’ suit sat next to her so there you go, better she’s left in the desert for the vultures to pick at.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blueman and Sharpe*
Minutes then ...try harder mate ... you have the music in you <laugh>

Mate no matter how much more you read, your reading jokes won’t move me. It’s like me trying to wind you up cos you know nothing about being a mechanical engineer for example, you literally don’t care (I assume).
 
She would have to prove that she didn’t, under interrogation. <ok>

She can be arrested on suspicion, and charged if she gives away enough. The problem is she’d have some ‘no comment’ suit sat next to her so there you go, better she’s left in the desert for the vultures to pick at.


Doesn't work like that under terrorism laws.

The right of no comment is not an option.

The issue here though is she hasn't committed a crime as things stand.
 
FYI when returning to this country, even off holiday from Spain, if there is any terror related suspicion you can be stopped and questioned for a few hours, and you have no right even to ask for a solicitor.
 
Why even ponder this though? Sajid Javid probably hasn’t just thought it’d be funny to do and not considered it’s legality.

Apparently there are 3 options or choices here for shamima and all work against Sajid potentially

The worst being she comes back in 2 years

Can't say I know the details. Some bod was telling Kay burley
 
Doesn't work like that under terrorism laws.

The right of no comment is not an option.

The issue here though is she hasn't committed a crime as things stand.

I didn’t literally mean ‘no comment’, but she’d have said suit protecting her ‘rights’ and she’d more than likely give far less away and possibly/probably avoid prosecution. She’s as thick as pig ****, get her in a room without a brief and I would be confident she’d be doing a 20 year stretch.

You have no idea what she’s done.
 
I didn’t literally mean ‘no comment’, but she’d have said suit protecting her ‘rights’ and she’d more than likely give far less away and possibly/probably avoid prosecution. She’s as thick as pig ****, get her in a room without a brief and I would be confident she’d be doing a 20 year stretch.

You have no idea what she’s done.


That's the issue mate. No one knows what she's done. But going to be an isis bride is not a crime currently.

And as I said above the terror laws as they stand mean anyone coming back can be questioned, 8 hours i believe, and can't ask for a solicitor or use no comment
 
That's the issue mate. No one knows what she's done. But going to be an isis bride is not a crime currently.

And as I said above the terror laws as they stand mean anyone coming back can be questioned, 8 hours i believe, and can't ask for a solicitor or use no comment

Well she best hope she doesn’t come back then cos she’s an absolute pig of a person, even if she’s innocent she’ll **** up.

Although she isn’t innocent, she is a terrorist.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.