Lambo Vs Maynard

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Lambo or Maynard

  • Lambert

  • Maynard

Results are only viewable after voting.
bcfcredandwhite said:
You clearly have no idea that we have just changed managers - of course there is no reason why you should.
We have taken 10 points out of a possible 12 in our last 4 games - and we have very high morale despite our league position!
Let's hope your management is just as ignorant - then we'll give your boys a bit of a wake-up call! You never know - perhaps they think we're so cr@p they will give RL a rest and play your reserve team against us!
Click to expand...

Before our God like manager came Rickey was scoring for fun, now he still scores for fun.

so are we can only counting how a player plays since the change of manager?

Still Rickey by miles, who knows what NA could make of Maynard
 
Actually, with a population of 433,100 and an average gate of 13,009 this season, it's more like 97% of Bristol that doesn't support Bristol City!
 
Well your average gate would go up if we did! Fair play, you deserved to win. All I can say is we really missed Chaplow's energy.
 
Championship top scorers:

Lambert Southampton 12
McCormack Leeds 9
Austin Burnley 8
Henderson Millwall 8
McCann Peterborough 8
 
Bluebaldee said:
Lambert cost us £200k and scored 59 goals for Rovers @ £3389 per goal. Oh, and we got £1 million for him.

Maynard cost 82 £2.25 million and has scored 43 goals for the Teds @ £52,325 per goal. And he'll flee Trashton for nothing.

And that neatly crystalises the difference between Rovers and City.

City have an extremely rich owner who throws money at his pet project as if it's going out of fashion. They are living proof that if you throw enough crap at something, some of it will stick.

Rovers are owned by a well-off milkman and a fairly comfortable builder. They don't have the money to artificially improve our league position, that's why we're bumbling along in the lower leagues and are, quite frankly, crap.

It's a complete mystery to me why 82 are in the relegation zone of the 2nd tier. They have had an enormous quantity of cash thrown at them over the past decade, yet they're barely 6 league places above where they were under Wilson 8 years ago. A damning indictment of someone who knows how to make money, but has no idea how to spend it.

Truly a chronic waste of tens of millions of pounds.
Click to expand...

So do you have arich owner the difference being he trousers the profit and puts F-all back.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back