Josh Tymon

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I'm gutted he's gone because he's potentially a great player.

But all this crap he's writing on twitter is utter **** but it seems to be the modern way. He's signed for Stoke U23's for goodness sake. Not Man Utd. The biggest travesty of it all is that we haven't got 3-4 million for him.

Another thing that riles me is it's Ehabs ineptitude to why Tymon played so many games anyway. Because last year if he had done his job right he should of been no where near our first team in the Premier League. This makes it more alarming to the point why no contract had been offered.

Good luck to Josh but I'm a Hull fan I won't be following his career anymore and won't care how he ends up either way.

Old Faithful?
 
  • Like
Reactions: southerntiger
I get why OLM and Cortez want it locking - the narrative of Tymon being forced out seems to be on the slide and the real main reason is taking prevalence.

But why would you?

If it gets locked then, as the moderators are seemingly 'up for' locking it, then it's truly not 'our board' as claimed.

I haven't locked it and haven't said I want it locked, but nice try ****er.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cortez91
Why do you feel the need to go off all guns blazing on everyone you don't agree with? I didn't see anything in his post calling you names, so maybe try and refrain from so much abuse.

He'll be calling me a mutton-headed mugwump next.
 
Oh dear. How sad.

Cortez said:

"I'm all for locking it if you are?


[HASHTAG]#723[/HASHTAG]
Cortez91, Yesterday at 9:22 PM"

And you made some comment about getting rid of one thread (the one you merged I assume) and 'wanting/hoping another to die'

Of course, that means that both you and Cortez were diametrically opposed to locking a thread(s) doesn't it?

I locked nothing, I never intended locking anything, I'm more than happy for it to run its course. Now stop making **** up and try and post something either useful or interesting. Ta.
 
I locked nothing, I never intended locking anything, I'm more than happy for it to run its course. Now stop making **** up and try and post something either useful or interesting. Ta.

Less of the drama – you were clearly unhappy with the way the thread was going as its sentience didn’t fit with your ‘100% truth version’ - what with you being Tymon’s consigliere (or whatever ‘in’ role you like to claim you have) – you hoped it’d die off. Cortez explicitly said he was all for locking it too.

You want me to post something interesting or useful? Does require me regurgitating info gleaned from a range of nomarks off Twitter?
 
Less of the drama – you were clearly unhappy with the way the thread was going as its sentience didn’t fit with your ‘100% truth version’ - what with you being Tymon’s consigliere (or whatever ‘in’ role you like to claim you have) – you hoped it’d die off. Cortez explicitly said he was all for locking it too.

You want me to post something interesting or useful? Does require me regurgitating info gleaned from a range of nomarks off Twitter?

I'd already clearly said that I was posting nothing else on the matter, I couldn't give a **** what anyone else posted, it's entirely up to them.

Now stop been ****.