I was being fairly polite in asking you what evidence you had to support your view. I think it’s reasonable to ask for proof when someone is asserting something contrary to what appears to be true.
Then you came back with some sort of ill fitted attempted put-down gleaned from Zoella/Sex In The City/Beaches or whatever ****e fills the rest of your time when you’re waiting for Josh to call.
The point is you’ve made out yourself out to be ‘mates’ with Tymon on here and your ‘evidence’ appears to be from what he’s told you. Fair enough. But please appreciate that someone else might suspect this evidence to be bias, agenda driven and might also find it not to represent conclusive fact.
I'll apologise for my response then. It's not come across how I intended.
I've never said JT's side are innocent in all of this. I get you would expect bias but I know after the reduced contract, they've been as difficult to City as City have been to them. I said they're both to blame for this break-down a few posts back.
Embarrassing now.