Johnson formally charged

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
You're an idiot.


How so. Because I think he's guilty?

Am I not allowed to form that opinion because you don't share it?

I've been pretty bang on so far

I said he'd be charged
I said there'd be phone evidence etc and hey ho he's been charged with grooming.

Have you seen the Instagram post by her that was taken off twitter? Pretty much goes along with everything that he's been charged with.
 
How so. Because I think he's guilty?

Am I not allowed to form that opinion because you don't share it?

I've been pretty bang on so far

I said he'd be charged
I said there'd be phone evidence etc and hey ho he's been charged with grooming.

Have you seen the Instagram post by her that was taken off twitter? Pretty much goes along with everything that he's been charged with.


You're entitled to your opinion. As am I. My opinion is anyone condemning him as guilty is as idiotic as anyone who backed him as not guilty. You shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a jury box. You're a ****ing liability. <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Billy Death
You're entitled to your opinion. As am I. My opinion is anyone condemning him as guilty is as idiotic as anyone who backed him as not guilty. You shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a jury box. You're a ****ing liability. <ok>

That's ridiculous this is one case. I believe he's guilty based on what I've seen and read. Whats wrong with that?

If i was ever unfortunate enough to be called for jury service then I'djudge it on the evidence presented. The juries I've seen make me shudder, not two brain cells to rub together in some cases. Might actually help them having someone with a law degree.
 
That's ridiculous this is one case. I believe he's guilty based on what I've seen and read. Whats wrong with that?

If i was ever unfortunate enough to be called for jury service then I'd judge it on the evidence presented. The juries I've seen make me shudder, not two brain cells to rub together in some cases. Might actually help them having someone with a law degree.

Judging him without seeing the evidence of course <doh>

You have a law degree? How ****ing unethical are you!

You must log in or register to see images
 
  • Like
Reactions: Billy Death
It's almost as if some folks want it to be true.

Me i'm just burying my head

None of my mackem mates have ever said he is guilty and should be sent down...on the other hand all mags at work say he his guilty and should be sent down. Jono the skunk slayer:emoticon-0105-wink:<devil>
 
I makes no difference what anybody's opinions are.if it goes that far the jury will decide. <bubbly>
 
There'll be correspondence that show he knew her age and iniatiated a meeting regardless. Hence being charged.

If there was nowt he wouldn't have been charged with grooming.

They wouldn't have charged him for grooming off a fan photo would they,or her word with nothing backing it up.

How on earth do you know all this? For all we know the grooming charge could be for arranging a stay in a hotel with this lass without knowing a thing about her age..We just don't know at present..
 
Allegedly he has had sex with a 15 year old. If proved, he is in a very bad place - regardless of any protestations about being told (or otherwise) by her she was of an acceptable age.

Anyway, a married man with kids? (I'm sure when he signed for us I saw a picture on here with him carrying a bairn).......

Had the lass been even 16 (I think), that would be LEGALLY ok?

If she is 15. If he did have sex.

Tara AJ.

x
 
Put on a little make up, make sure you get your good side.

Don't drink, don't smoke, what do you do?

There must be something inside, (of you)

You must log in or register to see media
 
Allegedly he has had sex with a 15 year old. If proved, he is in a very bad place - regardless of any protestations about being told (or otherwise) by her she was of an acceptable age.

Anyway, a married man with kids? (I'm sure when he signed for us I saw a picture on here with him carrying a bairn).......

Had the lass been even 16 (I think), that would be LEGALLY ok?

If she is 15. If he did have sex.

Tara AJ.

x

Hello fella. How's tricks?
 
Allegedly he has had sex with a 15 year old. If proved, he is in a very bad place - regardless of any protestations about being told (or otherwise) by her she was of an acceptable age.

Anyway, a married man with kids? (I'm sure when he signed for us I saw a picture on here with him carrying a bairn).......

Had the lass been even 16 (I think), that would be LEGALLY ok?

If she is 15. If he did have sex.

Tara AJ.

x
Hello who are you <bubbly>
 
Allegedly he has had sex with a 15 year old. If proved, he is in a very bad place - regardless of any protestations about being told (or otherwise) by her she was of an acceptable age.
Anyway, a married man with kids? (I'm sure when he signed for us I saw a picture on here with him carrying a bairn).......
Had the lass been even 16 (I think), that would be LEGALLY ok?
If she is 15. If he did have sex.

<ok>
 
It will be decided in a court of law if he has broken the law with a 15 year old. The club I suppose cannot suspend/sack him until he is found to have broken the law.

Whether he is 'guilty' or not is a whole other question, for sure he has made life more difficult for his team mates/the club/us fans by being stupid and becoming involved (sex innocent or not) with an under age girl, it does affect morale and the PR around the club/fans