Johnson formally charged
- Thread starter C19RK73
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Spag bog, seasoned and with the body of Johnson's privates, hmmmm, might catch on that like..
in other words Johnson's Johnsons
His is Sainsbury's mince, remember the Elephant knackers contract they signed with Yugo yumminogo..
My mate works on the sainsburys beef mince line, he chucks all sorts in it, chewing gum, bogeys, pubes... Luckily for Diddles his wife is probably using lamb.
I've heard that's worse, bat droppings, cockroaches kidneys, the full monty..
- bollocks I've just asked the missus to use Quorn instead
Yeah that's much better, man made mould.
The old vids, they just hoya them in the mix with a bit of bisto best lamb flavoured gravy stock and hope for the best..
If it fails, then they can it as fly spray..
Magpies are part of the crow family & therefore officially classed as vermin.
Because of this it's open season on them.
I'll be out with the shotgun tomorrow looking for the black & white ****s.
He needs to plead guilty though to avoid trial. But he wouldn't plead innocent on grooming if the evidence is concrete would he? Virtually guaranteeing max sentence. This public interest bollocks makes it really hard to tell if there's anything solid or weather the case is built on circumstantial evidence(which it could well be for all we know) and the public interest part has forced charges. But ask yourself this, if you were a sexually active 15 year old girl and wanted to sleep with a footballer, how would telling him you're only 15 improve your chances of shagging him?
Those are the two words. Public Interest. All these comments saying they must have strong evidence isn't necessarily true. We just don't know init.
Prick, you could send Joey up to savagely beat him and punch him 20 times. Dickhead.
After mass riots and the assault of a horse, you would think it impossible for those levels of embarrassment to be trumped. Step forward SAFC. Fans singing his name after arrest is one thing (puke). The club suspending him after arrest, but failing to after charge is just...I can't even get my head around it. Astonishing. Because **** logic.
aside from the ***** disgusting element of it, shagging a 15 year old girl would be boring as ****. I remember how crap blow jobs were when I was 17/18 ish by birds of similar age to me, all teeth and that...
Bollocks to young birds the ones with a bit about them are where I'd be going, if I was a footy player, take a leaf out of Wazza's book, find some veteran slut who'd swallow the lot whilst doing her knitting.
Bollocks to young birds the ones with a bit about them are where I'd be going, if I was a footy player, take a leaf out of Wazza's book, find some veteran slut who'd swallow the lot whilst doing her knitting.
Not at all RAW, I haven't passed judgement on that.
What I said is I find it difficult to see how he can play, he's been charged with 'grooming' mate, that suggests evidence to support that he knew what he was doing and her age.
What seems left to prove is 'did he do it'.
What is certain, the only thing, is that none of this can have a positive impact on him, the club, the team.
As such, he shouldn't be playing, we have to focus on football.
It hasn't trumped your lot. Mass petulance leading to violence on the street? Or a bunch of fans signing the name of somebody who innocent until proven guilty? ****ing idiot.
This trumps it by far. I'm talking more about the club's actions than the fans btw, that's just a tasty little side order.